Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The group behind the t-shirt runs k12speech.com for students who want to know their rights in school
Quote:
Originally Posted by FL IRON
Quote:
Originally Posted by WCSD Dress code
No sexual overtones, or anything that promotes weapons, alcohol, drugs, tobacco, gang membership, or violence
Since YOU are going with "promotes violence", explain how this particular shirt promotes violence........ be specific,
Apparently school policy allows shirts which have words related to guns on them, but only when the message is anti-gun, making the phrase "...anything that promotes weapons..." a legitimate first amendment issue.
Apparently school policy allows shirts which have words related to guns on them, but only when the message is anti-gun, making the phrase "...anything that promotes weapons..." a legitimate first amendment issue.
Apparently?
Is this just something you heard from Fox News, or do you have a link to back this up?
And my link, I mean a link to a legitimate source.
Most adults can't carry guns at school. Usually codified at the state law level. If you can show me where a state law says a student cannot wear clothing depicting US Constitutional Rights, post it.
State law has no bearing on the school's dress code.
All the rhetoric about "rights" is pointless since most school aged kids aren't old enough to have all the rights of an adult.
Lawsuit is "Guardanapo v. Washoe County School District"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundaydrive00
Apparently?
Is this just something you heard from Fox News, or do you have a link to back this up?
And my link, I mean a link to a legitimate source.
That's what I love about your side -- you immediately decide that anybody who disagrees with you must have been brainwashed by Fox News. Just for that, I'm not giving you a link, you've got to work for it.
The sentence in question reads "No sexual overtones, or anything that promotes weapons, alcohol, drugs, tobacco, gang membership, or violence"
Google the Kendyl Depoali Middle School dress code for yourself, or read his lawsuit, Guardanapo v. Washoe County School District et al. I'll even help you out with a relevant snippet from the initial filing:
That's what I love about your side -- you immediately decide that anybody who disagrees with you must have been brainwashed by Fox News. Just for that, I'm not giving you a link, you've got to work for it.
So you have no proof that the school allowed anti-gun shirts, it was just something you made up. That's what I figured.
Maybe most school aged kids aren't old enough to have all the rights of an adult, but they do have rights
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundaydrive00
So you have no proof that the school allowed anti-gun shirts, it was just something you made up. That's what I figured.
See the word "promotes" in the dress code, quoted above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Foot
State law has no bearing on the school's dress code.
All the rhetoric about "rights" is pointless since most school aged kids aren't old enough to have all the rights of an adult.
There's no hope of him winning this lawsuit.
See Newsom v. Albemarle County School Board. Newsom, a sixth grader at Jack Jouett Middle School, won a very similar lawsuit (and $150K) back in 2004. Newsom's lawsuit was backed by both the NRA and the state ACLU chapter.
State law has no bearing on the school's dress code.
All the rhetoric about "rights" is pointless since most school aged kids aren't old enough to have all the rights of an adult.
There's no hope of him winning this lawsuit.
See Newsom v. Albemarle County School Board. Newsom, a sixth grader at Jack Jouett Middle School, won a very similar lawsuit (and $150K) back in 2004. Newsom's lawsuit was backed by both the NRA and the state ACLU chapter.
100% correct. And I'm stunned, simply stunned, that some people are under the impression that minors don't have Constitutional Rights. /SMH
100% correct. And I'm stunned, simply stunned, that some people are under the impression that minors don't have Constitutional Rights. /SMH
So, the left shows its hypocrisy AGAIN.
An under 18 year old does NOT have Constitutional rights in regard the 1st and 2nd amendments when it comes to guns BUT HAS Constitutional rights when it come to abortion.
"If you're under 18, you may or may not have to tell a parent in order to get an abortion — it all depends on the laws where you live. "
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.