Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2018, 06:29 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,507,037 times
Reputation: 4622

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
I'd like to see the cost associated with making these changes. I think that's the crux of the situation because I don't see any legal ramifications for them to go in and change the wording.
States publish new and revised laws every year. The cost of changing fireman and policeman to firefighter and police officer is zero to negligible.

These changes are updating language, not substantive. There's no sensible reasons to oppose This scrapping 'man' for neutral terms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2018, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
States publish new and revised laws every year. The cost of changing fireman and policeman to firefighter and police officer is zero to negligible.

These changes are updating language, not substantive. There's no sensible reasons to oppose This scrapping 'man' for neutral terms.
I'm not sure about that. No clue how to even find that out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2018, 05:36 PM
 
Location: interior Alaska
6,895 posts, read 5,862,705 times
Reputation: 23410
Quote:
Originally Posted by .sparrow. View Post
Hu-MAN.

HuMANity.

MANkind.

There is nothing wrong with "mailman, fireman, policeman" etc.
Yeah, it's pretty crazy how deep the dehumanization of females is built into English language, isn't it? The language is almost ill-suited to even discuss it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2018, 06:39 PM
 
Location: San Diego CA
8,488 posts, read 6,891,592 times
Reputation: 17018
As long as they put the fires out that's all that matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2018, 06:49 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,135 posts, read 19,714,475 times
Reputation: 25661
Most businesses did this a long time ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2018, 06:51 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,012,426 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by .sparrow. View Post
Hu-MAN.

HuMANity.

MANkind.

There is nothing wrong with "mailman, fireman, policeman" etc.
Not the same at all.

Fireman clearly indicates a man who fights fires -- so a male firefighter.
Policeman clearly indicates a man who is a police officer and is a man. It just does. Policeman never meant a woman who was an officer -- never has.

The words you have chose as justification for never ever calling someone who is a woman a fire fighter instead of a fireman -- just don't work as a logical, reasonable or intelligent excuse.

I know we are becoming a nation that doesn't care about reading, vocabulary, the intricate differences in the meanings of word......reading comprehension is sliding daily --

We are sliding so low....new lows every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2018, 07:32 PM
 
6,835 posts, read 2,400,677 times
Reputation: 2727
Sometime I sympathize with lawmakers who get requests for these outrageous legal changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top