Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You left out dirt bags Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, etc.
“Are you really counseling me not to articulate principles I’ve been advocating for decades because they sometimes help someone you and I voted against?”
If you believe that Dershowitz is representing the Defendant in order to make lots of money or to "get the defendant off the hook" for the charges, then you are merely demonstrating your ignorance of American (US) jurisprudence.
The primary purpose of a criminal trial in the US is to force the State to prove the veracity of its accusation/s beyond a reasonable doubt.
This is because our founding fathers did not trust men and or governments to always play fair.
As the defendant's counsel, the attorney (in this case, Dershowitz), is there to make sure that the State does not run roughshod over the defendant's rights, which are protected by our Constitution, and to make certain that the State proves the veracity of its accusation/s brought against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
You should be very thankful that we have attorneys willing to do this type of work.
I agree with you, but the problem today is, many many people do not, they would be quite happy to see people like Weinstein executed with NO trial or conviction, all it takes to convince them is an accusation! Ive said it before, there are many americans today that would be happier living under a brutal dictatorship or monarchy, they side with Govt/ courts/ law enforcement instead of their fellow citizen...Its crazy!
If you believe that Dershowitz is representing the Defendant in order to make lots of money or to "get the defendant off the hook" for the charges, then you are merely demonstrating your ignorance of American (US) jurisprudence.
The primary purpose of a criminal trial in the US is to force the State to prove the veracity of its accusation/s beyond a reasonable doubt.
This is because our founding fathers did not trust men and or governments to always play fair.
As the defendant's counsel, the attorney (in this case, Dershowitz), is there to make sure that the State does not run roughshod over the defendant's rights, which are protected by our Constitution, and to make certain that the State proves the veracity of its accusation/s brought against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
You should be very thankful that we have attorneys willing to do this type of work.
And yet people went INSANE over Hillary representing an accused rapist. It was discussed incessantly on this forum.
They couldn't have cared less about the constitution. And she was a young, no-name attorney (unlike Dershowitz) who was told to take the case.
As Dershowitz has shown that he is a strong defender of due process and the Constitution, I welcome this move. Regardless of what I may think of someone (and it appears that Weinstein is a dirt bag), the state should still have to prove its case by going through all of the proper motions. If Dershowitz will help ensure that the state plays by the books, that is only a win for the Constitution.
Even Weinstein (like OJ) deserves a fair trail and a good defense.
Liberals are starting to hate Alan since he's been on TV lately calling out the Mueller investigation.
By smearing Mueller with the Whitey Bulger case?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.