Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Go read up... pregnancy is more dangerous than abortion.
Given that rationale, every pregnancy should be aborted to preserve women's health. It's actually medical malpractice for a doctor to not do so as they knowingly endanger women's health by aiding and abetting an ongoing pregnancy.
So you're admitting that state rules permit killing, but only if it's done by the mother. Many mothers consider having an infant, toddler, or young child "inconvenient." Can they kill them, too, at will?
What I mean is that fetal homicide laws do not apply to abortion.
Which is something a pregnant woman can do, by law.
A third person cannot go and take away the pregnant woman's right to carry a pregnancy to term, which would have resulted in a baby.
This is just another example of people not getting where they have no rights over a woman's body while she is pregnant.
That last part is just absurd and does not deserve a response.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Given that rationale, every pregnancy should be aborted to preserve women's health. It's actually medical malpractice for a doctor to not do so as they knowingly endanger women's health by aiding and abetting an ongoing pregnancy.
It's not THAT dangerous to a healthy woman. If it was, we'd have far fewer woman living through childbirth.
But... it is still more dangerous than early abortion.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Given that rationale, every pregnancy should be aborted to preserve women's health. It's actually medical malpractice for a doctor to not do so as they knowingly endanger women's health by aiding and abetting an ongoing pregnancy.
Which is why OB/GYNs have the highest rate of malpractice suits and the most expensive malpractice insurance. And it's also why so many visits are required for prenatal care and a laundry list of tests, ultrasounds and monitoring. It is dangerous, very.
My answer is to minimize every possible risk of an unwanted pregnancy.
Your answer is to shrug and say accidents happen, who cares.
Suppose I was a doctor who was operating on you. Which approach would you prefer? Mine or Yours?
How is outlawing abortions or the "heartbeat law" going to minimize risk of unwanted pregnancy?
As most doctors take precautions when preforming operations, and hopefully the anesthesiologist, nurses and everyone else involved does too, accidents/mistakes still happen. Just as most people take precautions to avoid unwanted pregnancies, accidents/mistakes still happen.
What I mean is that fetal homicide laws do not apply to abortion.
Killing is just as deadly by any other name (riff on 'a rose is just as sweet by any other name').
Quote:
A third person cannot go and take away the pregnant woman's right to carry a pregnancy to term, which would have resulted in a baby.
This is just another example of people not getting where they have no rights over a woman's body while she is pregnant.
Then men have the right to not be held financially responsible for any of their children. It's the same principle. She gets to choose. He gets to choose.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
