Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The NRA fought for the “Lawful Purpose and Self-Defense Act" which denies the government authority to reclassify bullets as “armor piercing ammunition.”
Quote:
It’s okay if the ammunition pierces body armor, as long as the manufacturer claims the ammo is meant to be used for sport and not for killing people wearing body armor.
Quote:
This provision is particularly timely because a growing percentage of Western grizzlies have been seen in recent years wearing Kevlar vests when they attack schools in Wyoming.
LMAO. Western grizzlies wearing Kevlar?? Did you even read what you posted?!! Obviously this guy is trying to be sarcastic, but it misses the mark completely. Maybe he needs some 'armor-piercing ammo'; also known as hunting ammo.
Last edited by swilliamsny; 05-11-2018 at 06:35 PM..
The NRA fought for the “Lawful Purpose and Self-Defense Act" which denies the government authority to reclassify bullets as “armor piercing ammunition.”
More idiocy from ignorant anti gun nuts. Virtually ALL rifle rounds will pierce body armor. Liberals would love to classify all rifle ammunition as "armor piercing" and ban it.
But it's ok for cops to use armor piercing bullets on civilians. I remember back in the 1990s when the "Black Talon" bullets caused such a controversy. Funny, many police departments use this kind of ammo.
The NRA fought for the “Lawful Purpose and Self-Defense Act" which denies the government authority to reclassify bullets as “armor piercing ammunition.”
Doesn't the NRA understand that this puts our law enforcement at risk?
I for one don't care about "our" cops. I only care about property rights.
If the military is allowed to use them to slaughter people overseas (paid for with my tax money), then by all means I should be able to own them as well for self-defense.
According to the left Trump is in collusion with Putin. When Putin starts landing the Russian tanks on American soil people are going to want armor piercing bullets.
The second amendment gives you the right to 'bear arms'. Assuming it means a fire arm e.g. rifle or pistol and not your physical arms and hands and fingers ... it doesn't say anything about allowing you to have bullets.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
