Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-11-2018, 08:00 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,137 posts, read 3,864,079 times
Reputation: 4900

Advertisements

L.A. budgets $430 million to help homeless, most of it long-term debt

http://documents.latimes.com/2018-pr...sing-projects/

http://hcidla.lacity.org/sites/defau...aff_report.pdf

L.A. County now has 58,000 homeless people. So why are there thousands fewer shelter beds than in 2009?

The initial construction blueprint for measure HHH shows that Los Angeles on constructing 1,242 apartments at a cost of 732 million or about $589,000 per unit.

With the 1,242 units they will be able to house around 5% of the homeless population. But the homeless population growing at 6,500 per year and escalating rapidly or well over 10% a year.

One building at 433 Vermont is projected to cost $48 million for just 72 units of housing or around $666,000 per unit.

Odd, how they are spending 732 million for 1,200 units of housing when they have 58,000 homeless.

Basically, for 732 million in construction spending for homeless and low income housing they will be able to house less than 5% of the current homeless population that is sky-rocketing every day.

The other interesting thing is that Los Angeles intends on utilizing long-term debt at high interest rates for social services. In the past it seems like nearly all long-debt that cities went into was infrastructure and now it is used for just general expenses.

Last edited by lovecrowds; 05-11-2018 at 08:39 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2018, 08:33 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,186,228 times
Reputation: 57821
Must be that new math they have been teaching in the schools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2018, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,815,703 times
Reputation: 14116
Maybe they should ask Salt Lake City if giving away free homes to the homeless makes for less homelessness or attracts more homeless from out of the area looking for free housing...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2018, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599
These are rent geared to income apartments - not necessarily for "the homeless".
Nationwide - apartment construction costs are $250-$300 per sq ft - higher in high rises and likely higher in more high density urban areas where demolition is also needed & higher in LA.
rough calculation...1,242 inits x 1,000 sqf t x $300= $362 million
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top