Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The difference between Hitler's attack on the Jews and Trump 's disgust with the drones who soil our streets is that the Jews did not choose to be Jewish; what part of this can't you understand?
I'm pretty sure that Mexicans didn't choose to be Mexicans, yet Trump called Mexicans "rapists and murderers". He also called a bunch of nonwhite countries "****hole countries" and he called Latinas "Miss Housekeeping".
Trump is actually following Hitler pretty closely here.
I'm pretty sure that Mexicans didn't choose to be Mexicans, yet Trump called Mexicans "rapists and murderers". He also called a bunch of nonwhite countries "****hole countries" and he called Latinas "Miss Housekeeping".
Trump is actually following Hitler pretty closely here.
what'smore depressing, is the people who eat it up. I saw the clip of Trump saying "they're animals" at his rally. The crowd cheered and screamed in agreement.
I don't know what's worse: The leader of the free world using similar dog-whistle language that the Nazis did to demean a group of people, or that tens of millions of Americans cheer it on.
what'smore depressing, is the people who eat it up. I saw the clip of Trump saying "they're animals" at his rally. The crowd cheered and screamed in agreement.
I don't know what's worse: The leader of the free world using similar dog-whistle language that the Nazis did to demean a group of people, or that tens of millions of Americans cheer it on.
I'm still willing to go out on a limb and bet you ain't inviting MS-13 to your Memorial Day shindig... am I right?
what'smore depressing, is the people who eat it up. I saw the clip of Trump saying "they're animals" at his rally. The crowd cheered and screamed in agreement.
I don't know what's worse: The leader of the free world using similar dog-whistle language that the Nazis did to demean a group of people, or that tens of millions of Americans cheer it on.
Trump didn't characterize all Mexicans a murderers, only the thugs at the head of the mob; you are inferring the rest through your Politically Correct jargon.
I for one, am proud to say that I am sick and tired of those who breed like animals and defecate in our streets like animals; they need to be rounded up and sent to a "pound" (Joe Arpaio style) where they can't get out, liquor and drugs can't get in, and lawyers can get in -- but have to work at it, which would discourage most of them. We might feel a duty to provide basic food and shelter, but that should be all until they either take responsibility for themselves, or identify themselves as the dead weight they are, and keep their heads down, and their hands busy. They have a right to their opinion, but we don't need the biased lame-stream media to sanctify it as Politically Correct.
Last edited by 2nd trick op; 05-17-2018 at 09:07 AM..
Trump didn't characterize all Mexicans a murderers, only the thugs at the head of the mob; you are inferring the rest through your Politically Correct jargon.
The White Nationalists in Charlottesville were murderers, they killed a woman in cold blood. James Alex Fields is now facing murder charges.
After the woman was killed, did Trump denounce White Nationalists or even single out James Alex Fields and call them "animals?" No, he referred to them as "very nice people."
"So there you have it. Trump is clearly talking about MS-13 gang members, but Andrea Mitchell -- quoting California Gov. Jerry Brown, no less -- wants you to believe Trump thinks all immigrants are animals."
Maybe they are projecting again and that is what they honestly think.
Why refer to any people as "animals," though? It's not particularly presidential.
Why not just refer to them as prisoners and/or criminals and be done with it? If they broke the law and were in jail, they'd be both.
Why refer to them as "animals?" I mean, does he know them personally? Can he speak to their specific situations? Nope.
It was not a wise move, politically, to refer to human beings, no matter their crimes, as animals. We are not at war with Mexico.
I could stand behind that sort of language when referring to a brutal military, but not when a sitting president is referring to individuals who committed a crime. I'm pretty sure Trump has committed plenty in his day.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
