Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Look at your own graph. Notice that the rate of descension has remain constant since 2012. Are you now going to finally thank Obama based on your link?
Did you look at the graph? Notice the drop at the end, who was president at this time?
A supply sider is like an eater that never uses the restroom.
In other words they are a huge ball of .....
Just about every swindle works one side of the equation.
People had no money or credit to buy it. My last post demonstrated it.
Anyway that's what happens when fictitious capital is financed , there is not enough real product. The cure however is not to remove buying power for good and services. The cure is to let the fictitious assets burn and for the assets to fall to their real price . We had a toll booth economy. That's the problem. The problem with supply siders is they don't seem to know when they are supplying toll booths.
Anyway I follow the classical economic model aka Adam Smith to JS Mill. The only weakness to that it it leaves out fiance in which case Keynes/ Kelecki and Schumpeter/Minski helps with the effects of public and then private fiance. If you don't then you speak in gibberish from my point of view.
Again, the product needs to be produced first. This lack of basic understanding is why all left wing governments create shortages.
The extreme drop, at the end.....did you look at the graph?
Now, there is no doubt that it has not been dropping.....
Are you talking a one moth change? Okay. See if you can find any of those between 2012 and 1026. The answer will be yes. 2011,1013,2015 all had similar drops.
Are you talking a one moth change? Okay. See if you can find any of those between 2012 and 1026. The answer will be yes. 2011,1013,2015 all had similar drops.
I'll agree with 11 and 13....not 15, you're stretching it.
But why is it continuing into 18? Some at the very beginnig of this thread said....thanks obama....do you agree with that? If you do agree with that, why?
I'll agree with 11 and 13....not 15, you're stretching it.
But why is it continuing into 18? Some at the very beginnig of this thread said....thanks obama....do you agree with that? If you do agree with that, why?
Read the entire thread. I stated that far too much credit is always given to any POTUS. The premise of this thread by the OP is simple. Trump is the reason why african american unemployment is at a historic low. If you agree with that they you are ignoring the trend of the graph.
You guys are really trying to push this African American unemployment line. Problem is, we ain’t buying it.
If we’re doing so well, it’s DESPITE Trump, not because of him. So don’t expect gratitude. It won’t be coming.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.