Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2018, 11:28 AM
 
Location: USA
7,474 posts, read 7,033,677 times
Reputation: 12513

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
The fact is liberalized trade is good for a nation and on that few economists, left or right, disagree.

Notice since the tariff crap the Dow has stopped advancing despite a capital gains tax cut legislated earlier this year.
Don't worry - the right-wingers will blame the tariff fallout on Obama just as they give Trump credit for the Obama recovery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2018, 11:30 AM
 
586 posts, read 314,422 times
Reputation: 1768
I stopped reading when I saw the Huffington Post as the source of the story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 11:39 AM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,212,399 times
Reputation: 5466
most economists who write opinion pieces have never worked a day in their life in a real job. many are simply academics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 11:41 AM
 
15,530 posts, read 10,501,555 times
Reputation: 15812
Renowned idiot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 11:55 AM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,163,127 times
Reputation: 12992
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The Rothchild's have lost market share? Not yet!


Trump said he was going to give the country back to the people....(from the evil Banks)
The significance if Andrew Jackson's portrait.
Trump has said on more than one occasion.... END THE FED.


I bet, Mr. Sachs is worried about his counterfeit slush fund, that allows him to be above all the laws of the little people.
Ending the FED would be a MAJOR undertaking. Do you really think a president with not much more than 40% approval can do it?
  1. And if that were to magically happen, what replaces it?
  2. What does the fed do?
  3. What are all the processed the FED does now?
  4. Which ones are important?
  5. Which ones are critical?
  6. Which FED duties are inconsequential? And if so, why are they doing it?
  7. How do they do it?
  8. And when replaced, what processes will still be needed?
  9. The FED processes and programs have been built through over a century of trial and error and economic tinkering. When the FED is wiped out, how many decades do you think it will take to replace those critical functions without destroying what is left of the imploded economy. We will most likely go through economic hell and lose much of our economic strength as a country; leaving the vultures to pick our bones.
  10. Won't whoever "replaces" he FED, actually just be the FED again under another name?
Over the years I've heard a lot of people mouthing the "Get rid of the FED" mantra. When I ask the above questions, they invariably have no answer. They stare back at you with that empty "what do you mean 'replace'" look in their eyes. The people they are parroting without understanding never told them the next step.

Get rid of the Fed is exactly like the get rid of Obamacare talk, "I have a beautiful plan to replace it - it will cover everyone and will be cheap." Holding all three branches of the government, most governorships, and the supreme court - yet they couldn't get that done.

Last edited by blktoptrvl; 06-03-2018 at 12:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 12:00 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,123,156 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by elan View Post
Renowned idiot.
As opposed to Trump the brilliant? lol Great debunking of what the economist had to say...good goin'.

Last edited by sickofnyc; 06-03-2018 at 12:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 12:04 PM
 
20,718 posts, read 19,360,295 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
most economists who write opinion pieces have never worked a day in their life in a real job. many are simply academics.

Well again he is an economist but his opinion was not an economic one. Its like a plumber saying the plumbing should be like so and Obama does not make the plumbing like so. Now he is a problem criticizing Trumps landscaping and carpentry,


Its also not impressive to have an accurate prescription . any competent practitioner with a proper diagnosis can do this. What were his diagnostic and predictive powers?

Here is a guy who predicted the housing bubble who is not thrilled about Trump's economic model. He just not muh globalist. So the regressive left has no use for a classic liberal.


Harper's Slow Crash | Michael Hudson
Let’s start with your 2006 Harper’s article. What did you see happening at that point?
It was very clear that more and more of everybody’s income had to go to buying a house. Housing prices were soaring, and the reason wasn’t because of population growth. And it wasn’t because people were getting richer. It’s because a house is worth whatever a bank is going to lend against it, and banks were lending more and more money against houses and pushing people further and further into debt so that basically they had to spend almost their entire working life to pay off the price of getting a home. People thought they were getting richer as house prices were going up, but while the sellers were getting richer, the people who had to buy the house had to pay a larger and larger proportion of their income.
When I first went to work on Wall Street in the 1960s, the rule of thumb in banks was you’d lend people enough money so that they could afford to pay the mortgage fully out of only one quarter of their income. In other words, banks wouldn’t lend if the cost of carrying a mortgage was over 25 percent of what they earned. The balance had to be written off in 30 years, so at the end of their working life 30 years later people would own the home free and clear.
Why doesn't the left hold Trump to hold this campaign promise if they wanted to enact real social justice?
You suggested that Trump might’ve had the right idea with his suggestion to abolish the deduction for interest. Do you see any sign of that happening?
Not a chance.
So Trump is not exactly my guy either, thanks in part of the muh Russia distractions to cover up the DNC vote rigging scam and HRC slush fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 12:06 PM
 
20,718 posts, read 19,360,295 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
As opposed to Trump the brilliant? lol Great deinking of what the economist had to say...good goin'.

So you don't like people calling people idiots for no reason? Maybe if you didn't do that with Trump that would not do it to you?

You are just like they are. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 12:08 PM
 
20,718 posts, read 19,360,295 times
Reputation: 8288
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The Rothchild's have lost market share? Not yet!


Trump said he was going to give the country back to the people....(from the evil Banks)
The significance if Andrew Jackson's portrait.
Trump has said on more than one occasion.... END THE FED.


I bet, Mr. Sachs is worried about his counterfeit slush fund, that allows him to be above all the laws of the little people.

What's your plan? Years ago I used to be like you BTW. That was 15 years ago. There is a problem, yes. However its complicated. The only real solution is to teach people in their youth how finance actually works. However that is not in the interest of those that draw power from the Matrix.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,993 posts, read 3,733,362 times
Reputation: 4160
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
Renowned??????

Jeffrey Sachs.... is a full moon batty lefty who works for the socialist Earth Institute at Columbia University, which pushes fasco-socialistic ideas like population control or eugenics



Renowned??????
Jeffrey Sachs..served as special adviser to the United Nations on the Millennium Development Goals (forced global socialism)



he is a full pledged Keynesian nut, and a globalist



Nina Munk, author of the 2013 book The Idealist: Jeffrey Sachs and the Quest to End Poverty, says that poverty eradication projects endorsed by Sachs, although well intended, have - years later - "left people even worse off than before".



so wow....a far, far left globalist-economist talks trash about trump......so is that supposed to impress people....the guy is a Keynesian wack-job

Anyone who opposes Trump and the GOP are "full moon batty lefties" to you people. Nothing in your post that says otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top