Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Florida & Cebu, Philippines
2,805 posts, read 3,252,433 times
Reputation: 2910

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
according to cnbc, the justices, in a 7-2 decision, faulted the Colorado Civil Rights Commission's handling of the claims brought against Jack Phillips, saying it had showed a hostility to religion.
It is about time some sanity has started to return to our country. The heck with SJW and anyone who needs a safe space, time for our country to be what it once was before Obama ruined it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:52 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
I never understood why any business would turn away a customer and I certainly don't understand why anyone would want to buy something from someone that doesn't want to and even worse is when they are forced to sell to you.



Would you honestly eat a cake from a bakery that you had to sue to force them to make you that cake?



I own a real estate company and we don't care if our clients are gay, a minority, followers of some whacky religion, total loudmouth know it all jerks or if they voted for Hillary or Trump. We will help them to the best of our ability.



I don't know why a business would turn away a paying customer but it is nice to hear that a business has that right.
Good points!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:52 AM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,397,040 times
Reputation: 9438
KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS,
C. J., and BREYER, ALITO, KAGAN, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. KAGAN, J.,
filed a concurring opinion, in which BREYER, J., joined. GORSUCH, J.,
filed a concurring opinion, in which ALITO, J., joined. THOMAS, J., filed
an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which
GORSUCH, J., joined. GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which
SOTOMAYOR, J., joined


The reason lawyers have to spend time digesting what the Supreme Court decided goes into all the concurring opinions. Kennedy's opinion was narrow in scope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:53 AM
 
10,086 posts, read 5,729,602 times
Reputation: 2899
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'm a Christian. I do not feel any freer today.
I do. This is a great slap down to the liberal gay agenda using discrimination law as a means to bring down Christianity in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,247,595 times
Reputation: 27861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
I like the headlines...

"Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake"

5-4 is a narrow ruling. 7-2 is as close to a sweep as you are going to get these days.
Media was lying again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:55 AM
 
13,943 posts, read 5,615,884 times
Reputation: 8603
A small victory for individual liberty. Yay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:55 AM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,806,221 times
Reputation: 3941
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
Precisely.

It's amazing and sad how little people understand the way their court system works.
I don't pretend to be an attorney on the internet so while I may have spoke too soon, I'm not a jerk to others until provoked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:56 AM
 
304 posts, read 160,169 times
Reputation: 222
While I am against discrimination I do believe people have the right to run their business as they see fit as long as the accept consequences of their actions. So even though I am liberal I think the supreme court made the right decision.



That being said I would also file this under a careful what you wish for category.



1) I'm sure there are more than a handful of people who are praising the Supreme court decision saying a business owner "should not be forced to go against his beliefs" , however fair or not this baker can be seen as a bigot and if people don't want to spend their $$ on his business for his beliefs the same people shouting praise will be the first ones crying persecution if people make the choice to avoid his business..can't have it both ways


2) This is more of a general question. By this logic, can a business say they will not cater to Christians? Can a business refuse to write "Merry Christmas". Bake a cake for a second or third wedding? Can they refuse to use a crucifx? an image of Jesus?



So you stuck it to the Homo's yay, good for you..take a victory lap, but from what I am seeing the people who identify as no religion/agnostic.atheist etc keeps going up and up, while people who identify as christian is getting less and less, no rapdily mind you but still decreasing. Turn about could be fair play and this decision just opened up a wide window to help turn about come faster than you think
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895
This ruling seems to apply to only this case and how the Colorado commission dealt with the case, not the law itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2018, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Christian Colorado Baker
Common sense ruling.

Should people have the authority to dictate what Stephen King writes in his books? No, it's his book so he gets to decide what he puts in and what he leaves out. Same with cakes, or any other product which requires creativity to produce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top