Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, this removes the excuse to pay politics from the Democrats. I remember, clearly, from September 2017, until ~March liberals beating the starving children drum, when the Republicans would not give in to Dem blackmail to pass the re-authroization of the program without better controls.
Now, the game continues by Dems in congress. Gotta' have us versus them game to be viable before their public.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA
Yes, there is a chance this could go bad. The unused 2017 funds would have gone into a contingency fund used for redistribution should there be shortfalls. Typically, if government is running smoothly, this isn't an issue. But it was an issued this year but they had previous years' contingency funds. Clawing these back does leave more risk to the program should "something" happen. So let's just hope it doesn't.
"Why Don't Anti-Abortion Advocates Care About Kids Already Here?"
Have you quit beating your spouse yet?
It is the old trick. State an untrue position then ask why they do it.
In many cases it's true. I've had to condemn this for a long time. I am pro-life. I support things that would lead to fewer abortions but unfortunately, many others who claim to be pro-life are not interested in those solutions, they just want to demonize people.
"It's full of political mumbo jumbo from people unwilling to go on the record."
The vote AND the BILL ARE on the record.
Who cares what people say when all you Have to do is READ the bill.
You didn't address the point. It's money that is said to have expired. Money that can't be spent so it doesn't even actually exist. You do not need a bill addressing something that can't be done anyway so it's all for show.
Want to highlight this, as it is at the root of political hypocrisy. This time the democratic party and its supporters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
You didn't address the point. It's money that is said to have expired. Money that can't be spent so it doesn't even actually exist. You do not need a bill addressing something that can't be done anyway so it's all for show.
You've embraced the tax plan and love Trump's agenda which does exactly what you despise and you continue to whine while voting for what you whine about.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
