Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well you used the old "anonymous" source deflection. Since all journalists use sources that that they do not reveal I was wondering what mystical media source do you divine news from?
Well you used the old "anonymous" source deflection. Since all journalists use sources that that they do not reveal I was wondering what mystical media source do you divine news from?
So, you really did not comprehend the link you provided....here ya go....these are his words...
"Pompeo told the Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday he is “optimistic” that the U.S. will receive some remains “in the not-too-distant future.” But, he added: “We have not yet physically received them.”
Maybe you don't understand what "optimistic means?
I did say something. And it was a factual observation.
You, on the other hand haven't said anything to me, other than calling my beliefs into question.
You said "Yep. More anonymous sources". The obvious implication is the old "fake news" deflection. Be honest. If that was not your intent then I will apologize. But give me a legitimate reason you made that comment.
When I asked what news source you used that did not use anonymous sources you did not answer. Is that a fair summary?
Blow up one missle site. Start up a new enrichment site.
Who didn't see that coming?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.