Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One of the first articles I read about global warming explained that when the heat sensors were put out 35-40 years ago, they were put in open fields. And that many of those fields are now next to airport runways and In the middle of urban areas surrounded by paved streets. So, the comparisons of readings are highly suspect. I can go from my home with its large lot and drive 2 miles to Walmart and the temperature will be 8-10 degrees higher in their parking lot.
Professional climatologists, being the simpletons they are, never took the urban heat island into account. Now, thanks to the sophisticated people on the internet, climatologists are now looking into the problem for the first time.
One of the first articles I read about global warming explained that when the heat sensors were put out 35-40 years ago, they were put in open fields. And that many of those fields are now next to airport runways and In the middle of urban areas surrounded by paved streets. So, the comparisons of readings are highly suspect. I can go from my home with its large lot and drive 2 miles to Walmart and the temperature will be 8-10 degrees higher in their parking lot.
Yes there were some sensors that experienced development and increased pavement, many were placed near airports for practical reasons where pavement has not changed much over time. There has also been adjustments made for urban centers but to discount readings of thousands of sensors because some have been impacted by development doesn't add up.
People like Anthony Watt will take a few sensors in an attempt to dismiss the entire case for rising temperature, besides are we really still questioning whether temperatures are rising. The evidence is completely overwhelming that the earth is warming, glaciers melting, coral reefs dying, polar ice shelves melting, sea level rise, increased storm intensity.
Professional climatologists, being the simpletons they are, never took the urban heat island into account. Now, thanks to the sophisticated people on the internet, climatologists are now looking into the problem for the first time.
Debauched.
You don't seem to realize that climate science is a debauched field. It is run by parasitic and non-productive human beings who feed at the suckling teet of state-provided grant money. Armageddonism rules and it's publish or perish. A scientist is someone who relentlessly and diligently pursues truth. A climate scientist is basically a welfare queen. A climate scientist is not a scientist at all, and should not be respected in today's environment. A climate scientist in 2018 is a political scientist. Debauched.
The problem with this is that valid climate science will not be able to be distinguished from fake news climate science for quite some time.
Therefore, the only path open to those who value freedom is to obstruct to the greatest degree possible, and point out that climate scientists are not real scientists..
Debauched. The field is debauched. It's tragic really.
Regarding the sensors, temperatures are often measured by satellites these days, i.e. without sensors on the ground. Satellites can measure temps across huge areas, which would be impossible with sensors.
You don't seem to realize that climate science is a debauched field. It is run by parasitic and non-productive human beings who feed at the suckling teet of state-provided grant money. Armageddonism rules and it's publish or perish. A scientist is someone who relentlessly and diligently pursues truth. A climate scientist is basically a welfare queen. A climate scientist is not a scientist at all, and should not be respected in today's environment. A climate scientist in 2018 is a political scientist. Debauched.
The problem with this is that valid climate science will not be able to be distinguished from fake news climate science for quite some time.
Therefore, the only path open to those who value freedom is to obstruct to the greatest degree possible, and point out that climate scientists are not real scientists..
Debauched. The field is debauched. It's tragic really.
So you have a double standard: all scientists seek truth except for climate scientists (for some unknown reason).
Why trust any scientist, then? Couldn’t all of them be welfare queens who live off the government?
So you have a double standard: all scientists seek truth except for climate scientists (for some unknown reason).
Why trust any scientist, then? Couldn’t all of them be welfare queens who live off the government?
Let it sink in for a minute that folks with that mentality are running the country..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
