Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You should probably read what Kavanagh said instead of repeating like a parrot whatever liberal talking head de jour you got your lines from.
In fact not only did he not say that a President is above the law, he said the exact opposite:
One might raise at least two important critiques of these
ideas. The first is that no one is above the law in our system of
government. I strongly agree with that principle.
A second possible concern is that the country needs a check
against a bad-behaving or law-breaking President. But the
Constitution already provides that check. If the President does
something dastardly, the impeachment process is available.
No single prosecutor, judge, or jury should be able to accom-
plish what the Constitution assigns to the Congress.
Moreover an impeached and removed President is still subject to
criminal prosecution afterwards.
That's fair enough.
So he's saying if you want the President to face charges, then impeach him first and then he'll be subject to the full brunt of the law.
Starting to see on Twitter that this may of been Justice Kennedy’s pick and was negotiated before he retired. Wouldn’t surprise me, this guy doesn’t seem like a Trump nominee, he has been entrenched in DC politics his entire adult life except to attend Yale.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Kavanaugh sides with liberals many times over the years. This pick far from excites the base, yet looks like it could be a layup to get through the senate (unless Rand Paul opposes). I just don’t see how the liberals can generate enough fake outrage over such a boring nomination to successfully block him.
This guy looks like a good replacement for Kennedy. I'm fine with it. I hope they don't fight it too much because I fear the next pick after would be more of a Trump pick.
This guy send like a good replacement for Kennedy. I'm fine with it. I hope they don't fight it too much because I fear the next pick after would be more of a Trump pick.
Yes, he is a younger version of Kennedy, and might end up leaning more on the liberal side when it comes to voting on issues.
If the socialists can't read the writing on the wall they should be told. The United States is returning to a bootstraps pull up paradigm. Work very hard and you will succeed. Btch and complain and you will fail.
The most recent SCOTUS decision re the Colorado Baker supported him not because he was anti gay marriage but because the Colorado commission clearly abused it's mandate and in overreaching violated his rights. SCOTUS protected him.
The next twenty years will be difficult on those that feel they are "owed" something. Assuming Kavanaugh is confirmed, there will be no quarter for mamby pamby "you owe me" and yelling and screaming. They might not agree but in the future the rewards will go to the brave.
Get Ready.
That was a very complicated case. And the baker won on the slimmest of margins. Read the decisions, it was certainly not as clear cut as you're making it. And not all business owners will be able to use the same argument.
This guy looks like a good replacement for Kennedy. I'm fine with it. I hope they don't fight it too much because I fear the next pick after would be more of a Trump pick.
I agree. I'm not alarmed by this pick in the least, especially considering some of the other candidates mentioned in this go round.
I'm so sorry if that lack of alarm disappoints our cultist friends here....
Yes, he is a younger version of Kennedy, and might end up leaning more on the liberal side when it comes to voting on issues.
That's possible but not very likely. He's conservative no matter how you look at it. He's not a middle of the road moderate and has very rarely leaned left on anthing. There's a lot more to this world than Roe v. Wade and Obamacare.
He's been enmeshed in a deep blue environment all his life and yet came out of it a constitutionalist.
I think that is an impressive talking point for conservatives. It's about the person, not the place.
I have to agree with this thought. His leanings seem to tend toward the Constitution rather than personal, ideological, or issues based. If so, I can live with it because the Constitution should be first order of business
That's possible but not very likely. He's conservative no matter how you look at it. He's not a middle of the road moderate and has very rarely leaned left on anthing. There's a lot more to this world than Roe v. Wade and Obamacare.
He comes across as a moderate to me. Maybe I'm wrong. Time will tell. Dems do not seem to have much ammo against him, and maybe they shouldn't even bother, because they aren't going to get a more moderate nominee.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.