Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:09 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,586,584 times
Reputation: 4852

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
His text was very telling - "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

Not "liking" Trump is saying you'd like to stop it, or wish you could stop it. His wording showed intent to actually do something about it.
Cool. Describe with specificity exactly what action(s) he took to "do something about it" other than sending text messages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:10 PM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,213,236 times
Reputation: 5466
I really hope every American voter is watching this and that they see how the democrats are defending a treasonous FBI agent who clearly lies through his teeth. That is the democratic party today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:11 PM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,400,201 times
Reputation: 9438
And so the GOP Congressmen slink away with their tails between their legs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:14 PM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by what'd i miss View Post
Lots and lots and lots on Trump. That is why this hearing is taking place. R s are trying to find out names of who ELSE knows about trumps crimes before the BOSS gets back in town.

Trump may be excited to meet with Putin for ideas on how to dispose of his troubles for good.
America is currently led by a mob.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:15 PM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
I really hope every American voter is watching this and that they see how the democrats are defending a treasonous FBI agent who clearly lies through his teeth. That is the democratic party today.
Treasonous?

Strzok isn't the one in bed with Putin.

Neither are the Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,161,091 times
Reputation: 15546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
I laughed when he said he didn’t recall some of his texts because they were sent late at night. There is no context needed for many of these texts, they speak for themselves and he can’t defend them. He tried to pass off his “We will stop it†text as meaning the voters will stop it *eyeroll*

Dems we’re trying their best to shield him from having to answer anything and he always has that “FBI has forbidden me to answer this†line when needed.
This is also the Insurance Policy to hide behind, the witch hunt Investigation they use to not answer questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:17 PM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleh View Post
...

Theres no evidence anyone is in bed with Putin, even though Adam Schiff went from show to show a year ago saying they had the evidence on Trump, bring it.
Be careful what you wish for.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,161,091 times
Reputation: 15546
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Treasonous?

Strzok isn't the one in bed with Putin.

Neither are the Democrats.
Hillary sold 20 %of our uranium to RUSSIA. OF ALL THE NATIONS.. RUSSIA AND RUSSIA GAVE 145 MILLION BUCKS FOR HILLARY TO SPEND and it wasn't spent on charity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,161,091 times
Reputation: 15546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sactown4 View Post
Answer a question, with an unrelated question. Typical Conservative bs response.

You brought up recusal for bias.

It would be pretty hard for someone to claim that they don't have bias/conflict of interest judging the individual who appointed them to the greatest honor of their lives, no?
Recusal is used for cases of bias. Find out what the word recusal means and why people recuse themselves.

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/recuse
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2018, 03:22 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,652,035 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
I laughed when he said he didn’t recall some of his texts because they were sent late at night. There is no context needed for many of these texts, they speak for themselves and he can’t defend them. He tried to pass off his “We will stop it” text as meaning the voters will stop it *eyeroll*

Dems we’re trying their best to shield him from having to answer anything and he always has that “FBI has forbidden me to answer this” line when needed.
Its interesting and unbelievable that he couldn't recall a text he wrote but could remember the context of the same text. Total liar !!!

Mueller removed him, as he says, for the appearance of bias, not actual.
Rosenstein says he was bias.
The IG said his answers about his text weren't believable or creditable.
His polygraph was out of scope and he had access to information he shouldn't have had b/c of it.
The guy is a train wreck of unsupervised corruption. The FBI gets a black eye on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top