Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:50 AM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
Gowdy is an idiot. Nothing new to see here.
Of course he is an "idiot"

EVERY liberal who graduated from college is a genius and ALL repubs who gradated is an "idiot EVEN if they go BEYOND college and get "higher" education degrees such as a law degree.

And never mind he worked his way up to be an Assistant Unites States Attorney with an exemplary record of convictions.

" When you start a discussion with a juvenile insult, you have already LOST the discussion" as they say.
So, tell us, what is YOUR great "education" and life experience that we should give you ANY credibility on what you claim?

Come on, fess up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:51 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,109 posts, read 9,018,880 times
Reputation: 18771
the hearing yesterday exposed the FBi needs to be overhauled, people need to be fired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:52 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,628,813 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
So what you have as evidence of a conspiracy are Strzok's text messages but you can still not address a single action that he took to steer the election.


FBI sends secret txt msg to FBI Lawyer that FBI will prevent Trump from being elected.



That's far more damning evidence than the Russian thing, where there is no proof.



Either you decide to follow the trail fairly, or it's political. Your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:58 AM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
That entire hearing was a total embarrassment for the United States. Some of those GOP members were acting as if they were investigating the worst crime on the planet, attacking the FBI guy relentlessly.

They are no better than Trump himself.
"attacking the FBI guy relentlessly."

NO, just going after the FEW at the FBI that have abused their positions and power.

NOT the ENTIRE ranks of the FBI. As is said "suites NOT boots".

But, we NOW how the libs like to use the widest brush and exaggeration they can when making juvenile insults.

AH poor baby can dish it out but, CAN'T take it.

After hearing MORE of what he said about Trump and his supporters, you have NO credibility to attack those bringing is hatred to to the forefront.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
FBI sends secret txt msg to FBI Lawyer that FBI will prevent Trump from being elected.



That's far more damning evidence than the Russian thing, where there is no proof.



Either you decide to follow the trail fairly, or it's political. Your choice.
It wasn't the "FBI", it was Strzok who sent the message and if he wanted it to be a secret why did he use a government phone. They never moved beyond the text message to any specific action by Strzok.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:59 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,627,476 times
Reputation: 12560
The Traitor party loses this one. Like all of their schemes to shame people who don’t work for Putin. They don’t want the truth. They want their face time so when Trump watches it they’ll get their pat on the head. Strzok knew Trump was being investigated during the campaign. He never let on. Strzok did an admirable job in standing up to these phonies from the Traitor party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,109 posts, read 9,018,880 times
Reputation: 18771
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingtodd View Post
I agree the Dem party has to field a qualified candidate and not someone Trump-Lite. Trump has been an unmitigated disaster yet could very well be re-elected because his base has morphed into a cult like following. Mueller holds all the keys and will likely determine Trump's fate. In the near time, Dems need/should win the house in Nov. so the necessary oversight work can begin and the proper investigative questions can be asked and facts scrutinized. GOP right now has been blocking for and protecting Trump since he took office. That needs to end.
has Hillary announced yet for 2020?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 06:09 AM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
Hypocrisy.

I don't expect any Trumpers to quote me and address this, because they can't defend it.


https://twitter.com/RepDonBeyer/stat...87763089428480

And what dos this have to do with the Strrzok hearings?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 06:12 AM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstarling View Post
He would be better off left in the FBI chasing down Russians who want to harm our infrastructure, banks and elections rather than participating in this circus. It is all very sick. What a waste of time and money.

Some just don't like the sun shining on bad people.


We should just ignore them and let them continue doing what they have been doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 06:41 AM
 
Location: In the desert
4,049 posts, read 2,742,119 times
Reputation: 2483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
And what dos this have to do with the Strrzok hearings?
Bannon was under subpoena when he refused to answer questions and he wasn't threatened with contempt.

Strzok was not under subpoena and couldn't answer questions due to ongoing investigation and was threatened with contempt.
Shows bias.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top