Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:12 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 23,990,937 times
Reputation: 15559

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
do you think its okay for you to avoid a business because its politics, beliefs or values arent in line with your own?
Avoiding and banning -- two different concepts.

Sure avoid what you want....and a business can avoid the customers they don't want -- (they already do in some ways -- choosing their location, their price points, their services, etc.)...

I kind of agree with businesses should be able to decide their customers....but the whole concept of throwing someone out of a restaurant because they work for Trump -- meh -that's not right.

I don't like treating people poorly because you disagree with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:22 PM
 
45,203 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Avoiding and banning -- two different concepts.

Sure avoid what you want....and a business can avoid the customers they don't want -- (they already do in some ways -- choosing their location, their price points, their services, etc.)...

I kind of agree with businesses should be able to decide their customers....but the whole concept of throwing someone out of a restaurant because they work for Trump -- meh -that's not right.

I don't like treating people poorly because you disagree with them.
You want the right to discriminate while denying it to others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:33 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 23,990,937 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
You want the right to discriminate while denying it to others.
Not exactly.

I am suggesting that ALL OF US can choose where to shop, dine, get service done on our car, etc. nd that ALL OF US should not have the right to deny a customer because we don't like them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:35 PM
 
45,203 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Not exactly.

I am suggesting that ALL OF US can choose where to shop, dine, get service done on our car, etc. nd that ALL OF US should not have the right to deny a customer because we don't like them.
Yes exactly; One set of rules for you and one set for a business owner. No consistency whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:41 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 23,990,937 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Yes exactly; One set of rules for you and one set for a business owner. No consistency whatsoever.
But there are different rules for consumers and business owners in lots of other areas.

I think that as long as we are consistent with all consumers

and then consistent with all business owners -- you can have two different sets of guidelines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:55 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
8,750 posts, read 3,115,724 times
Reputation: 1747
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
But there are different rules for consumers and business owners in lots of other areas.

I think that as long as we are consistent with all consumers

and then consistent with all business owners -- you can have two different sets of guidelines.
That's not how it's supposed work.

Property rights are absolute. As such, business owners have the absolute right to discriminate against whomever they wish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 10:58 PM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,621,220 times
Reputation: 12560
Once you start that ball rolling you never know what’s going to happen. That seems like a good way to go out of business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
8,750 posts, read 3,115,724 times
Reputation: 1747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl View Post
Once you start that ball rolling you never know what’s going to happen. That seems like a good way to go out of business.
Free-market capitalism for the win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,204 posts, read 19,188,286 times
Reputation: 38266
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
But there are different rules for consumers and business owners in lots of other areas.

I think that as long as we are consistent with all consumers

and then consistent with all business owners -- you can have two different sets of guidelines.
Just on a practical level, it makes no sense to compare consumers and business owners. The business owner is dealing with the limited world of people who come into that business. Consumers are dealing with the entire world of businesses out there. Are consumers supposed to only go one time to any business, so that they keep trying different ones each time, regardless of location, price or even the goods or services offered?

Or said differently, do I have to go to restaurants that serve food I don't care for or that charge $100 for an entree when I have $10 to spend or drive past the 100 closest restaurants so I'm not "discriminating" against the ones further away? This isn't remotely the same as someone walking into a restaurant and being told oh, we only serve that dish to other people, you don't get to get it because of whatever characteristic they want to apply.

And yes, it means that the restaurant that refused service to Sarah Sanders would not be allowed to do that - but neither would the baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple. But if the latter is allowed, then there isn't a logical basis for say the former is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,323,020 times
Reputation: 2888
Refusing to serve customers based on political affiliation or religion is not the most prudent business decision if the goal of said business is to make money. However, we live in a free society and have freedom of association so I have no problem with it whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top