Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually the authorities are saying he didn't have a permit. Even if he did they are allowed to question him. They are allowed to remove his firearm from him if they are conducting an investigation. They are allowed to shoot you if you put your hands on that firearm. Again you are wrong.
There was no investigation. He was simply minding his own business walking down the street.
“But Judge Navarro prevented lawyers for the four men from raising First Amendment rights to free speech and Second Amendment rights to bear arms, saying that these were not applicable in the case.
“The law does not recognize these amendments as legal defenses to the crimes charged,” she said in a July court filing.”
Location: Free State of Florida, Support our police
5,863 posts, read 3,303,608 times
Reputation: 9147
He had no permit. He was illegally carrying a firearm. He attempted to flee while carrying a firearm. The cops have every right to question him. The cops have every right to detain him. He then attempted to pull his firearm. He was then shot and killed by the police. Thank god all the cops went home safely to their families. Great job by the cops!
“But Judge Navarro prevented lawyers for the four men from raising First Amendment rights to free speech and Second Amendment rights to bear arms, saying that these were not applicable in the case.
“The law does not recognize these amendments as legal defenses to the crimes charged,” she said in a July court filing.”
Was he found innocent? I don't care what the judge said, the people knew otherwise and it most certainly is applicable whether the judge approves or not.
They held their guns on officers of the state and were found innocent.
Was he found innocent? I don't care what the judge said, the people knew otherwise and it most certainly is applicable whether the judge approves or not.
They held their guns on officers of the state and were found innocent.
Innocent of what? Some of those men were sentence to Prison! These are two totally different cases and the argument you made was disproven and not allowed as a defense! why don’t you post the links for the stories where the white men get shot by cops? Please answer, because I’ve seen dozens of stories make the headlines. You hand pick the stories that fit your narrative and ignore the ones that don’t!
Since this guy was carrying illegally, my guess is they knew him from prior arrests. They knew he was carrying, which is why his shirt was pulled up to reveal the weapon.
People acting like this was Joe Innocent on his way from work back to his family and was randomly targeted and hassled for no reason, are pushing their typical narrative that cops are ALWAYS wrong.
Innocent of what? Some of those men were sentence to Prison! These are two totally different cases and the argument you made was disproven and not allowed as a defense! why don’t you post the links for the stories where the white men get shot by cops? Please answer, because I’ve seen dozens of stories make the headlines.
It would make you happy to make this a total race issue wouldn't it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.