Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes they invited the Judge to talk about her book and the Judge purposely pointed a finger at Whoopi and said she is suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome...dismissing anything Whoopi had to say as trivial.
Judge was arrogant, rude and deserved the dressing down.
If she is so smart, so experienced why did she feel the need to hurl a personal insult -- because she felt like she was losing.
That's what people do when they aren't able to stand their ground with a reasonable argument.
It happens on this board all the time.
Someone brings up Trump lying or refusing to stand firm with Putin and the Trump fans hurl all kinds of personal attacks dismissing folks that might not agree with them.
Doesn't matter if Judge said that's what happened -- it is gossip....it's about celebrities on a tv show.
And some are more into it.
I went and read the piece...at the end all the judge had to do was leave but she walked up to Whoopi and wagged her finger telling her how important the Judge was -- and Whoopi told her to get the f out.
Still didn't attack her personally -- just told her to leave -- in a rude way -- but when someone comes at you with insults -- you punch them back harder right?
Exactly! If you have a logica counter argument, you dont need to scream invectives at people
Most of us have been involved in conversations where one person constantly talks over everyone else. If you insist on finishing what your saying they become louder, even angry. This means that what you have to say isn't important, your not important. What they say is all that matters. This is typically what it's like talking to a liberal about politics.
WARNING: Pirro-maniacs don't enter the Twitter zone.
Unlike her Foxhole Friends, most of those on Twitter have "dish it out but can't take it", "karma is only a b*tch if you are" Jeanine's number. I can't quote them all but there are some g-o-o-o-d ones on there. The farther you go, the better they get. https://twitter.com/search?q=jeanine...Ctwgr%5Esearch
They include:
Ana Navarro who was there for it all confirming Whoopi's story. (Jeanine-selective memory and perception much?)
Pirro was witnessed ripping out her mic and shouting, "Those c*cks*ckers!" in front of the audience. (So, not just directed at Whoopi. Again Jeanine, there goes that memory and perception problem again.)
Pirro dubbed as the female Alex Jones. Well, that's pretty clear.
A mom who said Pirro came as a guest speaker to her daughter's school and then threatened to get up and leave when she didn't like the questions kids were asking. (An apparently familiar response.)
A tweet that questioned how Pirro can speak so much with Trump's member always in her mouth. (Sounds like she is well acquainted with the term she blasted others with above.)
Whoopi is reported to VERY RARELY react as she did when provoked by Pirro. (True. She tends to be chill even when she has an opinion on an issue. Takes a lot to get her riled.)
Pirro is well known for being loud, outrageous, obnoxious and disrespectful of others.
And so, so much more! Including a review of her book:
Quote:
Liars, Leakers, and Liberals stands as an unintended self-indictment of the author: She tries to prosecute the president’s critics as slavish defenders of the entrenched power structure, but in the process she enthusiastically outs herself as an unprincipled, untrustworthy, and thoroughly rotten vassal of the president’s. Pirro is the embodiment of the media corruption she rails against.
And if she wants to call herself an “idiot,” well, there’s no reason to object to that either.
Interesting how she becomes the poor, done-to victim by the time she gets back to her hood at Fox when real people witnessing what happened didn't see that at all. Pirro, a victim?
Last edited by mollyblythe; 07-20-2018 at 05:17 PM..
WARNING: Pirro-maniacs don't enter the Twitter zone.
Unlike her Foxhole Friends, most of those on Twitter have "dish it out but can't take it", "karma is only a b*tch if you are" Jeanine's number. I can't quote them all but there are some g-o-o-o-d ones on there. The farther you go, the better they get. https://twitter.com/search?q=jeanine...Ctwgr%5Esearch
They include:
Ana Navarro who was there for it all confirming Whoopi's story.
Pirro was witnessed ripping out her mic and shouting, "Those c*cks*ckers!" in front of the audience. (So, not just directed at Whoopi.)
Pirro dubbed as the female Alex Jones. Well, that's pretty clear.
A mom who said Pirro came as a guest speaker to her daughter's school and then threatened to get up and leave when she didn't like the questions kids were asking. (An apparently familiar response.)
A tweet that questioned how Pirro can speak so much with Trump's member always in her mouth. (Sounds like she is well acquainted with the term she blasted others with above.)
Whoopi is reported to VERY RARELY react as she did when provoked by Pirro. (True. She tends to be chill even when she has an opinion on an issue. Takes a lot to get her riled.)
Pirro is well known for being loud, outrageous, obnoxious and disrespectful of others.
And so, so much more! Including a review of her book:
The truth always cut deeper than lies.... It hurts bad.
Lies are always laughed off... They are too easy to disprove.
Whoopi got cut deep! It hurt so bad she went off on a death squeal.
Whoopie actually got up and left her chair. Here is what happened that viewers didn't see.
Whoopi used Antifa tactics. O'donnell has nothing over on Whoopi.
Translation, the judge had a different opinion than Woopi so Woopi went TDS. Can't have a different opinion than liberals you know.
Perhaps if Crooked Judge Jeanne weren't screaming at Whoopi, pointing her finger in her face and calling her names - she would have gotten a MUCH better reception.
Quote:
Originally Posted by r small
This Pirro broad is a piece of work. If you look up harpy in the dictionary there's a picture of her.
Agree. I never could stand to listen to her bellow on Fox.
Quote:
Originally Posted by victimofGM
I don’t believe Whoopi’s version of what happened. This is a television studio and they do continue recording when they go to commercial. If this really happened then there would be video and or audio evidence. Produce the evidence. Until then I believe Whoopi is making more personal attacks this time to deflect blame onto the victim of her attack.
Of course you don't. RWNJ's don't believe facts; they believe whatever fits their narrative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH
With Ana, Ana asked the specific question she did because Pirro claimed that she (Pirro) isn't ideological...which is, IMO, a ridiculous claim. Pirro tried to change the subject on Ana, rather than answering the question, which would have allowed a path for Ana to drive home that the judge is ideological.
LOL. It's sweet that Pirro was loudly proclaiming that she isn't ideological.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17
Exactly! If you have a logica counter argument, you dont need to scream invectives at people
Then why does Pirro do it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mollyblythe
WARNING: Pirro-maniacs don't enter the Twitter zone.
They include:
Ana Navarro who was there for it all confirming Whoopi's story. (Jeanine-selective memory and perception much?)
Pirro was witnessed ripping out her mic and shouting, "Those c*cks*ckers!" in front of the audience. (So, not just directed at Whoopi. Again Jeanine, there goes that memory and perception problem again.)
Pirro dubbed as the female Alex Jones. Well, that's pretty clear.
A mom who said Pirro came as a guest speaker to her daughter's school and then threatened to get up and leave when she didn't like the questions kids were asking. (An apparently familiar response.)
And so, so much more! Including a review of her book:
Interesting how she becomes the poor, done-to victim by the time she gets back to her hood at Fox when real people witnessing what happened didn't see that at all. Pirro, a victim?
Ana Navarro the Republican confirms Whoopi's version of events? That's good. So do I.
I've always suspected Pirro had a mouth like a sailor; her voice sounds like she's been smoking for the past 50 years and loud on top of that.
I can totally see Crooked Jeanne going off on some little kids.
As mad as Whoopi is she didn't say anything mean to the Judge
Spot on.
This Judge is very manipulative and cruel. She started it by pointing her finger saying she suffered from Trump Derangement Syndrome (aka that Whoopie is hysterical)
This lady is affiliated with FOX NEWS so there ya go
Whoopie actually got up and left her chair. Here is what happened that viewers didn't see.
Whoopi used Antifa tactics. O'donnell has nothing over on Whoopi.
Sane, Rational folks are not going to believe anything coming from FAUX NOISE .... A shameful state run lying propaganda media outlet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
(So, not just directed at Whoopi. Again Jeanine, there goes that memory and perception problem again.)
Well, that's pretty clear.
(Sounds like she is well acquainted with the term she blasted others with above.)
