Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are already many 'ghost guns' in existence, these have no serial numbers, no brands, no ways to track them, Any metal fab shop can crank out guns, even full autos, and build them from scratch.
It would still be illegal for them to print and own a gun.
Well we all know nothing stops unwanted activity better than declaring it to be illegal!
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62
There are already many 'ghost guns' in existence, these have no serial numbers, no brands, no ways to track them, Any metal fab shop can crank out guns, even full autos, and build them from scratch.
I have a few built from 80% lowers. Officially they don’t exist and never will. Guns? What guns?
This whole 3D gun thing is just idiotic IMHO. I don't really understand why this would even be made "legal" - what's the purpose? Even if it's limited in use, only takes one shot. There is so much debate about current gun laws, why allow totally hidden guns (even single use) to be allowed? Just makes no sense in modern society.
This whole 3D gun thing is just idiotic IMHO. I don't really understand why this would even be made "legal" - what's the purpose? Even if it's limited in use, only takes one shot. There is so much debate about current gun laws, why allow totally hidden guns (even single use) to be allowed? Just makes no sense in modern society.
So we should give up rights in "modern society"? That is what is wrong with liberals.
This whole 3D gun thing is just idiotic IMHO. I don't really understand why this would even be made "legal" - what's the purpose? Even if it's limited in use, only takes one shot. There is so much debate about current gun laws, why allow totally hidden guns (even single use) to be allowed? Just makes no sense in modern society.
Well, banning or restricting it now is even more silly. As they say, the internet is forever.
Significantly, the government expressly acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber – including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms – are not inherently military.
Does that declaration mean that criminals, lunatics, and other such people are any more qualified to own such weapons? Does that statement make those weapons any less dangerous?
Ugh... right-wingers. They don't trust the government to keep extreme weapons out of the hands of known troublemakers, but they do want the government to regulate everything else, from who can get married to what religions are acceptable.
As for the 3D printed guns - just another way for lunatics to kill people... something the far-right will label "freedom?!"
There is about to be a huge reduction of gun laws thanks to the liberal 9th court.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
