Trump must have talked with Rand Paul and is considering removing security clearances from some Obama intel officials. (brainwash, money)

[what'd i miss]

Sounds normal. Out of the job..turn in your keys..kind of move that I wouldn't have even thought did my all ready exist.
Trumps just a posturing bully and smearing over the media is all he ever does.

Ha! Uses the media to discredit his "dissenters" then screams the media is the enemy of the people.

[MMS02760]

Originally Posted by what'd i miss

Sounds normal. Out of the job..turn in your keys..kind of move that I wouldn't have even thought did my all ready exist.
Trumps just a posturing bully and smearing over the media is all he ever does.

Ha! Uses the media to discredit his "dissenters" then screams the media is the enemy of the people.

If it truly is to revoke the credentials of former employees, why is that only those that have openly criticized the current administration are being singled out?

The ominous truth is that this possible WH move is just about silencing critics.

[greywar]

Originally Posted by phma

Clearly you don't have a clue what you are talking about. There is no first amendment right to a security clearance.
If people didn't have it now there would be no need to take it away from them.

I did not say that. However, your first amendment rights are impinged when the government takes action against you for using them. And this is about them talking about Trump in a negative light, nothing more, nothing less. The actions taken against them are being taken because the exercised their first amendment.

[4dognight]

Originally Posted by Boss

Trump going after people who served in the last 2 administration.

Trump is in trouble as people start seeing what he really is. A weak small minded person influenced by the last person he talks to on any given day.

Um, really? Did it ever cross your mind that the last two administrations are the ones in trouble? Evidently there is reason to remove security clearances.

Originally Posted by greywar

I did not say that. However, your first amendment rights are impinged when the government takes action against you for using them. And this is about them talking about Trump in a negative light, nothing more, nothing less. The actions taken against them are being taken because the exercised their first amendment.

This is your opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

[Geeo]

One shall not be permitted to criticize our Glorious Leader! All dissidents against the regime must be punished and Glorious Leader shall not be questioned.

[greywar]

Originally Posted by 4dognight

This is your opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

my opinion...backed up by reality. Or do you think those 6 people were listed because they were friends of Trump? What nonsense.

[saltine]

Just watched fake evening news cbs. No mention of rand Paul. No mention of monotizing. Just speculation that potus is silencing his critics etc. Is there any doubt the msm is biased?

[phma]

Martha Maccallum of The Story on Fox has Rand Paul on explaining his position on the issue.

He says Brennen is a dangerous leaker who has put people in danger in the past.

[johnp292]

I haven’t read every post, but as someone who once actually had a security clearance, I am curious just what all you folks who are getting your panties in a bunch over this think having a security clearance after employment with the feds or a contractor gets you access to?

I’ll give you a hint. Nothing.

This is much ado about nothing.

[Loveshiscountry]

Originally Posted by johnp292

I haven’t read every post, but as someone who once actually had a security clearance, I am curious just what all you folks who are getting your panties in a bunch over this think having a security clearance after employment with the feds or a contractor gets you access to?

I’ll give you a hint. Nothing.

This is much ado about nothing.

Was your security clearance the same as Brennans? lol your post said nothing.