Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-30-2018, 12:47 AM
 
2,662 posts, read 1,378,296 times
Reputation: 2813

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
https://www.dailywire.com/news/33593...s-kassy-dillon

Feminist Geography is a peer-reviewed academic journal.








no comment really needed....
Yeah. Better not take my son near a dog park. Exposure to the goings-on there will make him the next Ted Bundy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2018, 12:53 AM
 
2,662 posts, read 1,378,296 times
Reputation: 2813
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
I would say that leftists writing about dog parks promotes nonsensical insanity.

I think Helen needs to get out into the natural world a bit more, where she can see how little doggies, little horsies, and little squirrelsies propagate so they don't go extinctsies.
Yep. Because most leftists think this way. And we never go to dog parks so we have no ability to see through this sort of gibberish.
The second paragraph I agree with wholeheartedly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 01:00 AM
 
9,418 posts, read 13,500,168 times
Reputation: 10305
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Does not appear any such journal exists.

Appears more like right wing making stuff up.

But if not certainly someone can post a link to the actual journal and article.
So did some research. Journal traces back to Taylor & Francis "predatory journals." It's a sham peer review process, hoax articles. I LOVE having an advanced degree and the smarts to research!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,761,514 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXNGL View Post
So did some research. Journal traces back to Taylor & Francis "predatory journals." It's a sham peer review process, hoax articles. I LOVE having an advanced degree and the smarts to research!
Taylor & Francis is a legitimate publisher of academic journals. Did you find evidence that other articles in A Journal of Feminist Geography are hoaxes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,354,091 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Taylor & Francis is a legitimate publisher of academic journals. Did you find evidence that other articles in A Journal of Feminist Geography are hoaxes?
*****************************************
Taylor & Francis created what has been called "predatory journals" in a scheme to transfer rejected manuscripts from its other journals to the Cogent Series. Authors of rejected manuscripts are asked to submit their papers to a Cogent Series journal for a significant pay-to-publish transaction. The scheme, however, was exposed as having a sham peer review process when Cogent Social Sciences accepted a hoax article, "The conceptual penis as a social construct." When the authors announced the hoax, Taylor & Francis retracted the article. [37]
*****************************************
From the Wiki

So not the first time this has happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 10:15 AM
 
6,835 posts, read 2,401,741 times
Reputation: 2727
At least this is a new article that many left- and right-leaning people can agree on something that is really stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,532 posts, read 34,863,037 times
Reputation: 73774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eumaois View Post
At least this is a new article that many left- and right-leaning people can agree on something that is really stupid.
Silver lining!!

Yeah, complaining about feminism from this article is like claiming all construction workers are murderers, because one was found guilty.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
I suspect it may be a fake, although we need some better proof. The author supposedly spent 1000 hours observing dog parks in Portland. That's 6 months, 8 hrs/day, 5 days/wk. Who is going to do that for one paper?


Based on the fact that the author stopped responding to emails when asked about her PhD, it could have been just some grad student trying to build her resume. If it were intended as a hoax, presumably she would have admitted it to deliver the punch line, and the journal would have taken it down.


update: according to Reason.com, they have looked into the matter and found that the paper is NOT a 'Sokal-esque' hoax, as the Reason writer says he first suspected. Sokal was a mathematician who stuffed as much gibberish as he could think up into a paper, and submitted it to a journal called Social Text IIRC. They published it, and it got bang-up reviews. Then he came out and said it was a hoax. Also Reason gives the number of hours as 100, so 1000 listed by Daily Wire may have been just a typo.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/11/d...n-wilson-study


So it appears to be real, dashing the hopes of some liberals on this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 02:02 PM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,810,168 times
Reputation: 3941
Academics are getting paid to do these studies by taxpayers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
I'm going to guess that since the study appears now not to be a hoax, the liberals who clearly hoped that it was will flee this thread like a pack of Chihuahuas running from German Shepherds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top