Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
CNN was using a blue screen, to report on Sandy Hook as they staged the scene, and mislead their viewers to run a narrative. It was one of the first of many "staging scenes" that MSM has been caught doing.
Jone immediately jumped to it being set up theater to run a gun control narrative.
If CNN had not tried to stage the scene, none of this would have happened.
Jones Lawyer: "You should be suing those that edited the truth"
If there is a hell, I'm pretty sure Alex Jones is headed there for the way he's gone after the families of little children who died at the hands of a school shooter.
That's downright evil, even for a "shock" actor like him.
He has no shame - - he will profit off of statements he knows are wrong and hurt other people immensely.
At some point, it will push somebody over the edge and whatever happens to Jones will be richly deserved.
He didn't win the lawsuit.
It and the others are still ongoing.
You don't get slap back filings, without a judgement. Texas Law, the Judge has to award legal damages, including court cost to the winning party. Nothing stops an attorney doing it pro-bono.
MK-Ultra right? The government went back to their books for a 1950's/60's experiment some 30/40 years later and started to set up school shootings? I don't believe it. Collumbine was not that so let's throw that out immediately. Tucson was targeted to a specific person so let's throw that out. Sandy Hook (IE.the specific case in question) I can't say it is because if there was a case, why exactly wouldn't the parents be in on it? Also the neighbors knew something was up with that kid, an autistic son of a broken home and taken to a gun range by his mom who had a fetish for shootings and saw it as a game (which from working with special needs students, isn't exactly out of the realm of possibility as they don't get normal social cues and can be violent even extremely violent.) If the parents were in on it, would they sue for slander and expose this? I don't think so. You can't just spout off conspiracy theories, you got to think for yourself like I just did.
MK-Ultra may have been used for Aurora (though due to him seeing a psychologist, it might have been legit) and Vegas, but Occam's Razor says that it wasn't a factor in Sandy Hook like you claim defending Alex Jones. You gotta give proof behind a theory. Saying "MK-Ultra does little because it might have been the single time the US government DID test on people to alter minds, but simple fact checking produces common shooter logic or sound logic based on the facts. Blindly following a conspiracy theory leads us to the PizzaGate hold up.
MY Ultra was in the 70s and 80s, but who knows what they have going on today in the realm of psy-warfare, probably much more bizarre than anything in MKU.
The state did not file this sham of a lawsuit - Jones did.
All of this nonsense about suing the parents is simply his lawyer's attempt to get the parents' case dismissed.
It's part and parcel of the same case.
"In addition to asking for the cases to be dismissed, Jones also wants Pozner's family to pay him more than $100,000 in court fees. A state district judge has a month to decide whether to let the lawsuit involving Jones and Pozner's parents continue. Jones' attorney has not responded to CBS News' request for comment."
So, no, Jones has not won anything and no, the parents case has not been ruled frivolous.
Time to exit this fantasy world you've created.
He has to file his legal damages. It is Texas Law. Loser pays all court and legal fees.
Now the lawyer may do it pro-bono, but the judge has to award damages, for frivolous lawsuits.
Texas wants you to have a damn good case, or pay for the damages you caused.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 7 days ago)
35,630 posts, read 17,968,125 times
Reputation: 50652
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
So, you are making a statement as fact, based upon what you have been told?
That's rational
Were you in the courtroom? I was.
Yes, I am taking that as fact, based on what responsible media has reported.
Because where I live, here on Planet Earth, major media is a fairly reliable source, and people who are followers of Alex Jones get pretty much everything they say wrong 100% of the time.
So yes. Although you say you were there and you state his lawyers didn't say on the first day of the trial, you are a stranger discussing your belief on an internet forum. Which sometimes works out fine.
When you add to that that you believe in Alex Jones, that makes you zero credible.
Because followers of Jones/Trump have a single filter on statements that are made regarding Jones/Trump: is it favorable to Jones/Trump? Then it's true. Is it unflattering about Jones/Trump? Then it's false.
And as funny, and predictable as it is to watch, it's also terribly frightening. Terribly.
Why wouldn't you attempt to recover your court fees that you were forced to PAY because someone decided to drag you into court? It's a normal thing to do.
Because, like the 13 frivolous lawsuits that have been file on Jones since Trump won, can add up to millions in legal fees and bankrupt people, for lies.
That is what they are trying to do. So far 7 of the 13 have been tossed and slap back awarded to Jones.
His lawyer is banking, and not costing Jones a Dime.
There have been 13 frivolous lawsuits file on Jones, just since Trump won the election.
They are done to slander Jones in the headlines, as witnessed here.
It is also done to cost Jones a butt load of money in legal fees.
These people not living in Texas forgot all about the "Slap Back" filing by the courts, or that is already figured into the budget to ruin Jones in the eye of the publics opinion, with headlines just like this.
Comet Ping Pong Pizza in DC demanded Jones retract his remarks about the restaurant operating a child sex ring in its basement. Texas Law gave him 1 month to comply or be subject to a libel suit. Jones complied.
Jones retracted his remarks about Chobani Yougurt as a part of a settlement with Chobani.
In April, Jones retracted what he previously pushed as truth about Sandy Hook.
It seems Jone only retracts when he is fCed with litigation or as a part of a settlement of a suit.
He seems to enjoy portraying himself as a victim.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's a normal thing to do.