Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This chick only needs to read this one paragraph and her debate is already lost:
Note that this is Bastiat's definition of socialism (in 1850):
"Now, legal plunder can be committed in an infinite number of ways. Thus we have an infinite number of plans for organizing it: tariffs, protection, benefits, subsidies, encouragements, progressive taxation, public schools, guaranteed jobs, guaranteed profits, minimum wages, a right to relief, a right to the tools of labor, free credit, and so on, and so on. All these plans as a whole — with their common aim of legal plunder — constitute socialism.
America is the only country in the industrialized world that does not provide the basics for its population yet has a military budget 4 times the rest of the world combined.
The Republicans feel genuinely threatened by this woman and want to try and torpedo her early.
They are skeeered....
I mean - they are OBSESSED with this one particular candidate.
Will they try and demonize her like they do other democratic women?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24
Debate her to what purpose?
Is Candace Owens running in her district?
Why should Ms Ocasio-Cortez validate this proposed dog-and pony show?
So that this organization can further spout their propaganda?
Ridiculous.
Absolutely. The only people she should be debating is anyone running against her in her district. Period.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm
ms cortez is the one bleating about how great socialism is, and if she cant intelligently support her position, then perhaps she needs to get out of the race. the one running scared is ms cortez.
I don't think so.
I mean - ya'll never showed BERNIE this much attention.
The Republicans feel genuinely threatened by this woman and want to try and torpedo her early.
They are skeeered....
Yeah 0 for 10 n the last election endorsing candidates really is skeery. Actually, we are loving brainless Barbie's 15 minutes of fame and don't want it to end too soon. In the debate of ideas, liberals always and I mean always lose which is why The Left want to stop free speech.
Note that this is Bastiat's definition of socialism (in 1850):
"Now, legal plunder can be committed in an infinite number of ways. Thus we have an infinite number of plans for organizing it: tariffs, protection, benefits, subsidies, encouragements, progressive taxation, public schools, guaranteed jobs, guaranteed profits, minimum wages, a right to relief, a right to the tools of labor, free credit, and so on, and so on. All these plans as a whole — with their common aim of legal plunder — constitute socialism.
The difference is that when Obama was wrong and called out, Democrats pulled the race card. When Hillary was running, Democrats pull the gender card. And now Cortez is pulling the sexism card for daring to call her out.
It's constant and consistent tactic of the Democrat party, and people see it for what it is and are fed up with it.
Really? Then why aren't people abandoning the Democratic Party?
I was told by a woman I worked with that calling a woman a girl was condescending. I haven't done it since.
Good boy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.