Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A political hatchet job for sure. He was denied proper disciplinary process by the FBI to appease the traitor in the White House. Fealty to Trump is now a requirement for federal service.
Oh BS!! He violated the Hatch Act. Grounds for termination. Now his gf needs to be canned as well.
Do you think it's realistic to have an agency that it's culture and employees won't have individual opinions or, biases? OR do you think there are no people that can put those opinions aside, and focus on the mission and what it simply legal, or illegal?
For the 3rd or 4th time, I have no issue with people having individual opinions or biases because we all have them. That is not what took place in this case, this is a case of an FBI agent using his position of power to affect investigations that he had some control of. He abused his position, he openly used gov. issued equipment to talk about preventing a duly elected official from taking office and he spent countless hours paid for with our tax dollars texting his mistress about illegal and unethical stuff.
For the 3rd or 4th time, I have no issue with people having individual opinions or biases because we all have them. That is not what took place in this case, this is a case of an FBI agent using his position of power to affect investigations that he had some control of. He abused his position, he openly used gov. issued equipment to talk about preventing a duly elected official from taking office and he spent countless hours paid for with our tax dollars texting his mistress about illegal and unethical stuff.
Except the only “abuse of power” that you have been able to identify was changing some verbiage in a report not because he was biased, but because an FBI lawyer directed him to do so.
Except the only “abuse of power” that you have been able to identify was changing some verbiage in a report not because he was biased, but because an FBI lawyer directed him to do so.
Yes so I guess we'll just have to disagree. You should find someone else to argue with, I'm too happy to waste the time any more and he'll still be fired no matter what you say or believe.
Yes so I guess we'll just have to disagree. You should find someone else to argue with, I'm too happy to waste the time any more and he'll still be fired no matter what you say or believe.
Hard to disagree with facts. The attorney independently corroborated Strzok’s account of the change, under oath. Other than the one change, you haven’t identified any other act that Strzok took that supposedly affected the Clinton investigation. Certainly, after months of investigations, the IG didn’t find one.
How dare anyone criticize Herr Trump? Off with their heads!
Good idea, that's what the punishment for treason normally is.
Strozak was part of the plot to elect Hillary and then to depose Trump, hang em.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
