Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Everyone both in and out of the government has the right to criticize the president when the "truth" is there. Too many far right conservatives forget that liberals on the left are progressive enough to read, listen and understand what the "news" is telling them. It's called critical thinking, something that isn't always understood by the closed minded individuals.
As far as I can tell, conservatives - I mean, the ordinary people, not elected officials - don't seem to read much.
Certainly weird to have so many high-ranking security/enforcement guys criticizing the president so sharply.
If this had happened to Obama, conservatives would have jumped on the bandwagon, but with Trump they just ignore it.
They would called for a lynching if it were Obama and it is worse than ignoring...they are defending Trump still...without even factual reasons for doing so.
Now this is a tough one. On the one hand we have a man who has devoted his entire life to public service and most recently years to keeping the terrorists from killing us with great success. On the other hand, we have a man who dodged the draft refusing to serve anyone but himself, has lived a life of debauchery and moral corruption, publically begged our enemies to commit crimes on behalf of his campaign, disclosed secrets to our enemies during visits to the White House, and backstabbed and insulted the very people who keep us safe from our enemies. Hmm, I guess I will go with the second guy, Trump, on this.
Now this is a tough one. On the one hand we have a man who has devoted his entire life to public service and most recently years to keeping the terrorists from killing us with great success. On the other hand, we have a man who dodged the draft refusing to serve anyone but himself, has lived a life of debauchery and moral corruption, publically begged our enemies to commit crimes on behalf of his campaign, disclosed secrets to our enemies during visits to the White House, and backstabbed and insulted the very people who keep us safe from our enemies. Hmm, I guess I will go with the second guy, Trump, on this.
This is why Brennan no longer has security clearance. Going around accusing the president of colluding with Russia with zero evidence is not some small little things. And has consequences
Statement from Senate Intel Chairman Richard Burr on Comments by Former CIA Director John Brennan
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Senator Richard Burr (R-NC), Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, issued the following statement on comments made in The New York Times by former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Brennan:
“Director Brennan’s recent statements purport to know as fact that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power. If Director Brennan’s statement is based on intelligence he received while still leading the CIA, why didn’t he include it in the Intelligence Community Assessment released in 2017? If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the Special Counsel, not The New York Times.
“If, however, Director Brennan’s statement is purely political and based on conjecture, the president has full authority to revoke his security clearance as head of the Executive Branch.”
I'll take the word of the guy that got bin Laden over a grifter that ripped fellow American at a bogus university any day.
you take the word of a partisan hack globalist that has lied under oath to Congress about the NSA spying.
the same AHOLE that said the Obama's drones program of killing civilians and children was legal, moral, and effective.
Even the Atlantic, a liberal news source has said Brennan has lied to hide the ugly realities and crimes. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism also exposed his lies about his programs as Director of the CIA.
You hate Trump, I get it but Brennan is a partisan hack with a cloudy record of lying and crimes with top security clearance with a political agenda that he shouldn't have kept.
Now this is a tough one. On the one hand we have a man who has devoted his entire life to public service and most recently years to keeping the terrorists from killing us with great success. On the other hand, we have a man who dodged the draft refusing to serve anyone but himself, has lived a life of debauchery and moral corruption, publically begged our enemies to commit crimes on behalf of his campaign, disclosed secrets to our enemies during visits to the White House, and backstabbed and insulted the very people who keep us safe from our enemies. Hmm, I guess I will go with the second guy, Trump, on this.
Brennan is a war criminal......just on his lies and defense of his drone program under Obama that killed civilians and children should give you pause about the man. Add his lying under oath about the NSA spy program and you admire this partisan hack that has been in the deep state for most of his adult life and doesn't want to go away? lol
Brennan is an incredible hack. He's been caught lying repeatedly. He routinely politicized intelligence. He sought to silence dissenting intel voices. Whatever you think about Trump's decision, it's a mistake to lionize a political hack.
John Brennan is a worse terrorist than Bin Laden could ever dream of.
And how is that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.