Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Can a sitting president be indicted?
Yes 84 63.64%
No 48 36.36%
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2018, 04:40 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,924,139 times
Reputation: 3461

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Good written up opinion piece.

Should we be able to indict a sitting president? Consider Spiro Agnew.

President Richard M. Nixon’s Watergate scandal was simultaneously exploding, and Nixon seemed to be imploding. If Watergate took down the president, it was imperative that Agnew be out of the line of succession. The urgency of the situation, and the imperative to avoid having a corrupt felon take over the presidency, gave Agnew enormous bargaining power. And he used it.

But the most significant impediment to holding a president accountable to justice is the statute of limitations. Generally, most federal crimes must be charged within five years or forever be barred. For crimes committed while the president is in office, there will be time enough at the end of the president’s term. But if a president engaged in financial crimes before taking office, or committed crimes to gain that office, the time for charging those crimes could well expire before his or her term concluded.

That is one of the reasons a grand jury should be permitted to indict a sitting president, as long as all further proceedings are postponed while he or she is in office. Unless an indictment could issue against a sitting president, there would be a perverse incentive for an alleged White House felon to seek reelection simply to avoid indictment while waiting for the statute of limitations to expire on crimes he had committed.The history of the Justice Department’s conflicting positions on this question does not categorically foreclose issuing an indictment against a sitting president.

Even where lawful, the use of the criminal process against sitting or former presidents should be undertaken with caution. In an ideal world, what our presidents and presidential candidates should most fear are voters, not prosecutors. But where the crimes are extremely serious and the proof compelling, the principle that no one is above the law may leave little choice but to proceed to court.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.b6dbca2fbbbe
Interesting piece. Makes one consider the relevance of sealed indictments. If an indictment is, or already has been filed, however is sealed, that would stop the clock on the the statute of limitations. The government could then ask the court to stay the case until Mr. Trump leaves office. There are good reasons for doing so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2018, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Homeless
17,717 posts, read 13,533,813 times
Reputation: 11994
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post

Right, because President Trump lived in NY where there are very few shady characters.
He was in construction and real estate. No money changing hands there!

.
B.S. Trump greased more then a few palms along the way to get his projects built. Trumps just as shady now as he was then. Failure to see this is because your blind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top