Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Supreme Court will function fine until after this investigation is completed. I don’t want a President under investigation appointing anyone for anything. The Republicans would not want it either if the roles were reversed.
Who cares who started it or opened up the door. The point I was making that seems to have flown over some posters heads was how the electorate through democracy are picking a SC nominee's lean by their votes in up coming elections Was this the intent of the founders? Has democracy reared it's ugly head to taint the SC nomination process?
That wasn't necessary until "interpretation" of the Constitution became a fashionable way to do an end run around it when you don't like what it very plainly says.
Decades of allowing and even encouraging legislation from the bench is what got us here.
Thanks for the reminder.... it's time to send Harry Reid another Thank You card!
Harry Reid never stole a Supreme Court Justice. The GOP was fine living without a SCOTUS for a year but now it’s a rush, but don’t worry the judge handpicked by the Federalist Society will get his seat after the hearings. I would like to know more about his background, what’s the rush.
That wasn't necessary until "interpretation" of the Constitution became a fashionable way to do an end run around it when you don't like what it very plainly says.
Decades of allowing and even encouraging legislation from the bench is what got us here.
Live by the sword..........
I agree with you, the Citizens United Decision sure fit the definition of legislating from the bench.
The Supreme Court will function fine until after this investigation is completed. I don’t want a President under investigation appointing anyone for anything. The Republicans would not want it either if the roles were reversed.
Being under a politically motivated witch hunt investigation shouldn’t limit the Presidents powers
An illegitimate prez who "won" through illegal means, under investigation for treason, SHOULD not be allowed to appoint a justice who has expressed the opinion that a sitting prez can't be indicted.
We're being sorted out between Americans and Trumplings. Choose your side carefully. We'll see which side GOP senators are on. Because in this contest of America vs tRump...
Trumps ability to pick anyone for anything should be curtailed at this point. He is under investigation. I’m sure if it were a Democratic president the Republicans would argue the same way. Kauvenaughs papers have not all been read either. why the rush? The Supreme Court is doing fine without the addition of Kavanaugh.
Trumps ability to pick anyone for anything should be curtailed at this point. He is under investigation. I’m sure if it were a Democratic president the Republicans would argue the same way. Kauvenaughs papers have not all been read either. why the rush? The Supreme Court is doing fine without the addition of Kavanaugh.
Investigation for winning an election he wasn’t supposed to win pretty much
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
