Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ok, so 18 year olds were legal to drink in 1982. Since it was a scaled implementation any individual who turned 18 prior to July 1 (which I find strange since MD state laws typically don't go into effect until Oct. 1) would have been legal, yes?
I think I got the 1988 date from it being fully implemented.
1988 had zero to do with it. The law went into effect July 1, 1982. So yes, someone who was 18 prior to that date remained of legal drinking age. Anyone who turned 18 after then had to wait to 21.
that's twice you've made this claim. present your evidence the alleged vomit in question was his, and links please.
That's easy enough, have another hearing so James Roche, Brett's college roommate, can be asked to testify. But do you think the GOP would allow that considering they have scheduled a vote for tomorrow? No.
They are doing their darn hardest to prevent the truth from coming to light! I want to hear from James Roche, Mark Judge, Mark Judge's former GF and the other accusers. if we don't, then this whole thing is a farce and Kavanaugh absolutely should NOT be voted through!
I don't know about any of you guys, but in my high school calendars, if I met a girl at a party or got lucky and got around to any bases, I would have noted that in my calendar with an exclamation mark or some similar code.
And I know some of my girlfriends had a much more extensive code list of their very own.
Jesus, what an evasive Kavanaugh answer re: whether he was the "Bart Kavanaugh" in Mark Judge's book.
That was a poor answer imo. A better answer would have been, "As far as I know, this is not about me and is not me. I did not engage in this behavior".
So dems..let's place a bet how low you'll go on questions ..I say you pull the... 'so judge Brett. ..you state you encourage females....support their goals...we have here a report that it shows that's how 'grooming victims' is done. So can you explain how you aren't grooming your victims'.
Yes I can see them twisting his words to use against him.
Dems..I'm sure you'll go that depth...it's your go to method.
He's pi$$ed. His name, HIS family, has been raked through the coals. He's had to explain stuff to his young children that she should not have had to at that age. His life has literally been ruined by this circus.
I hope it does backfire.
So does my husband and his friends.
At one point in time for my husband 18 beers were too many...now it's about half. It varies on tolerance that has been built up.
I just love how Republican women throw other women, even sexual assault victims, under the bus. As a former rape counselor, I can assure you that NO sexual assault victim would subject herself and her family to such public abuse if the charges weren't true. Powerful men like Kavanaugh, who are sexual predators and never have to face confrontation about it, are EVERYWHERE. Get a clue.
1988 had zero to do with it. The law went into effect July 1, 1982. So yes, someone who was 18 prior to that date remained of legal drinking age. Anyone who turned 18 after then had to wait to 21.
The "seniors" were not legal as Kavanaugh has repeatedly said, just those who had already turned 18.
Which is exactly what I said. You have people, including yourself, calling Kavannaugh a liar for saying that wasn't so.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.