Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is not so clear cut. Sometimes these investigations go on and on and beyond the narrow scope of what is the issue at hand - see the Starr and Mueller investigations.
If I were Kavanaugh and even I was innocent I still would not agree to volunteer for a fishing investigative expedition - if the committee wants it they can authorize it. I am sure that if you were the person on the line for SCOTUS you would say the same thing. It is easy to do the quarterbacking from a keyboard on the Net.
This is an FBI background investigation. It can only go where Director Wray says. Mueller and Star had no boss. They were permitted to go wherever the evidence led even if new things came up. If Director Wray starts fishing, he will get his chain yanked by his boss.... Jeff Sessions.
Once again - it was, and has NEVER been about Kavanaugh...
It is about WHOEVER Trump nominates!
Well, since the GOP stole the nomination and hearing from Obama, and since Trump will nominate only someone who he thinks is partisan enough to protect him on the SC, we do have to be careful. . . .
Just curious, how did you feel about the Dems during Clinton rape allegations? Did you rush to the accusers defense? .
THIS ^^^^ and where are her outraged posts on Ellison whose accuser actually has evidence??!
The hypocrisy from the female liberal/dem posters here is mind blowing and so transparent
This is an FBI background investigation. It can only go where Director Wray says. Mueller and Star had no boss. They were permitted to go wherever the evidence led even if new things came up. If Director Wray starts fishing, he will get his chain yanked by his boss.... Jeff Sessions.
No, the FBI cannot be limited by anyone in terms of the content of the extent of their investigation. And Jeff Sessions, as much as I deplore him, has already shown his unwillingness to interfere with investigations.
Oh come on. My daughter voted for Johnson, she thinks Ford is lying.
What? So? The point is...you missed the point. There are people that cannot relate to how others can have different reactions and display totally different symptoms to a particular set of circumstances and events. There are people negating how a young girl...any young girl...might react when in a fear provoking situation. That is the point!
Well, since the GOP stole the nomination and hearing from Obama, and since Trump will nominate only someone who he thinks is partisan enough to protect him on the SC, we do have to be careful. . . .
There you go - dems don't want him on the bench because they want someone who will support to impeach Trump when they move for it and it works it's way up to SCOTUS.
Just out of curiosity....has anyone been able to prove that Ford and Kavanugh even knew each other?
LOL — Ford said a friend of hers introduced them, but when asked by Mitchell, she can’t remember the friend
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
