Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Imagine the loony liberal snowflakes meltdown, if the FBI decided to declare Kavanaugh completely innocent without ever questioning him or anyone involved.
You know. Like they did with Hillary Clinton.
I know how it works, sir. I'm saying if I were him and I were accused, I would be doing everything in my power to prove my innocence. But maybe that's just me.
Why does the accused have to prove their innocence?
Originally Posted by jimj View Post Oh I see, YOU think the justice system in our country works backwards now. Listen very,very closely, that's NOT how it works.
The "victim" trotts her arse down to the Police station in Maryland and files a complaint. That complaint is either investigated or not and then it proceeds from there. At NO POINT is anyone forced to take a test that is not admissible in court or that can be tricked (by a skilled psychologist maybe?).
You see, we have this thing called a CONSTITUTION and a BILL OF RIGHTS. Accuser presents their case and the accused gets to defend themselves. Sooooo sorry that's inconvenient for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom
Hey, I don't have a dog in this fight. No need to yell at ME, Mojambo. LOL> So let's just all wait and see how this plays out, shall we?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom
If I were Kavanaugh, I would march my own arse over to wherever I had to go to prove my innocence. I'd take any number of lie detector tests, do anything in my power to prove my innocence. It's like with the Russia investigation. If there is no collusion, just let the investigation play out until the very end. He would then be proven innocent. How hard could it be?
No dog in this fight? No need to yell at you? In this system the ACCUSED used to be INNOCENT until proven guilty.
Keith Ellison is standing for election, not a lifetime appointment. It's up to the voters in his district to address the charges.
hmm so if a politician is standing for election which is shorter term you excuse his abuse of a woman? I wouldn't think that with abuse toward women there would be a difference between either. Abuse is abuse Democrats don't care about women.
For Democrats, it's no big deal when a Democrat abuses a women. SlowMotion is excusing Keith Ellison for alleged abuse of a women "based on terms of service" we should look the other way,... for them it's all political.
Why does the accused have to prove their innocence?
Prove that he:
1. Was not nominated by Donald Trump,
2. Will be a reliable rubber stamp for whatever the "Politically correct" outcome is on every case,
3. Is a person of color, and
4. Is not a man.
I don't put it past the increasingly desperate senate Pubs to cram Kavanaugh through, no matter what. In fact, that's pretty much what McConnell was yipping and yapping about this afternoon.
But if they do that, it's the GOP that'll be devastated as a result. They already have Thomas and his dirt on their hands. Putting a second sexual predator on the SC might be a teensy bit unpopular with a large % of half of America's population.
You will be so devastated. The exposure of what the Democrat Party has become, will be complete.
The guy has proof he was not even around to be at any party.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so if a politician is standing for election which is shorter term you excuse his abuse of a woman? I wouldn't think that with abuse toward women there would be a difference between either. Abuse is abuse Democrats don't care about women.
