Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2018, 06:39 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23898

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
Did the OP and the other Trumplings in this thread notice how many times the stock market hit new highs while Obama was in office? No, of course they didn't.
Did you read the opinions in post #3?

The stock market were hitting all time highs during the Obama term, but the economy as a whole was lagging.

My OP was about anyone noticing amidst all of the noise from last week.

I only mentioned Obama when someone made a comment about him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2018, 06:45 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,979,187 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Sorry, no one buys it. You're only responded to posts mentioning Clinton and Obama.

If your point was as claimed, you would have criticized the premise of the thread, rather than attacking anyone who actually posted accurate stock data.
Anyone who knows how to read buys it because here is my first post in this thread, so try again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
100% absolutely false, but nice try. Just over 50% of the population holds stock and benefits from the market going up. Although I will say that Trump has little to nothing to do with the market going up, nor did Obama, Bush, Clinton, or any other previous president, its all a lie that they tell you to try and get votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 06:47 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,979,187 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Try again. The economy under Obama outperformed the economy under Trump. Trump has never come close to Obama's best quarterly numbers.

And B. Clinton kicked both their asses on the economy, and Trump cultists think the Clintons are like Satan.
OH, so now its the economy? This thread is about the markets, not the economy, so get your facts straight.

Last edited by t206; 08-26-2018 at 06:50 PM.. Reason: Leaving my original snarky comment, but will apologize since it wasn't NOLA who brought it up
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 06:48 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
OH, so now its the economy? This thread is about the markets, not the economy, so get your facts straight.
To be fair, I brought up the economy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Try again. The economy under Obama outperformed the economy under Trump. Trump has never come close to Obama's best quarterly numbers.

And B. Clinton kicked both their asses on the economy, and Trump cultists think the Clintons are like Satan.
I'm not going to keep going back and forth with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 06:49 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,979,187 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
To be fair, I brought up the economy.
Fair, I retract my snarky statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,541,930 times
Reputation: 15595
BTW, I wonder if any of the Trumplings here know what an inverted yield curve is, and what the recent significance in the news it's had lately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,874 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Your 401k performed much better under Obama than under Trump, and better still under B. Clinton.

And your 401k will perform much better once Trump is out.

In any case, the stock market is irrelevant when we have a criminal in cahoots with Russia in the White House. He's done.
The DOW hit 16,799 in SE 2007. It took until the end of 2013 just to get back to that previous high. That is a 6 years of zero growth in the DOW, under both Bush and Obama. The market was at ~18,950 in October 2016, prior to the election. From the peak in 2007 until Trump was elected the net gain in the DOW was dismal, ~2200 points-in 9 years. The slowest economic recovery from a recession on record. From then until now, the DOW has increased nearly 7000 points. 7000 points since Trump's election-vs 2200 in 9 years! Obama was a disaster for those with 401k investments that hoped to retire and live off of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,541,930 times
Reputation: 15595
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Productivity is the difference. The numbers reflect it, and people are feeling it on the street.
There is also nothing in any productivity numbers that are any different than what was seen under Obama. You're simply making up stuff.

Private Non-Farm Business Sector: Labor Productivity:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MPU4910063

Nonfarm Business Sector: Real Output
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PRS85006041

Nonfarm Business Sector: Real Output Per Hour of All Persons
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PRS85006092

Manufacturing Sector: Real Output
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PRS30006042

Every .... single .... measurement of productivity you can find has been doing nothing different than what it was doing under Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,871 posts, read 9,541,930 times
Reputation: 15595
Maybe this is what you were thinking of:

US second-quarter productivity strongest in 3 years
Quote:
U.S. worker productivity increased at its fastest pace in more than three years in the second quarter, depressing labor costs, but the trend in productivity growth remained moderate.

The Labor Department said on Wednesday nonfarm productivity, which measures hourly output per worker, rose at a 2.9 percent annualized rate in the April-June quarter. That was the strongest rate since the first quarter of 2015.
But notice that's in three years. Guess who was president three years ago?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2018, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,687,736 times
Reputation: 25236
Have you ever noticed that when the stock market goes up nothing changes, but when the stock market goes down you lose your job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top