Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That is correct, so the question should be... WHY does the left support that? Why are only Dem cities/states "sanctuary" cities/states? And why haven't garden variety lefties caught on to what the Dems are doing to them to benefit only the elite few?
I think those who employ illegals should be sent to the federal pen. One year in the klink for each illegal hired.
Is that why contraceptives aren't available in the US in red states?
Oh... wait.
America is a red nation and abortion is still legal for now. The right wing wants more government regulation. As long as it doesn't affect their corporate masters.
I think those who employ illegals should be sent to the federal pen. One year in the klink for each illegal hired.
I'll ask you the same question... If e-verify has a 54% failure rate in identifying illegal alien workers, what means do employers have to improve on that?
Also, a suggestion... First step... Get the Dems to introduce a mandatory e-verify bill and let Congress vote. We'll see who wants what regarding illegal aliens.
Funny how the right doesn't think employing illegals should be a crime. Even if illegals commit thousands of crimes. I guess the employers are too white.
America is a red nation and abortion is still legal for now. The right wing wants more government regulation. As long as it doesn't affect their corporate masters.
Corporations are the masters of the left. Why do you think the Dems won't introduce a bill to mandate e-verify or support one that does so? Why do you think only Dem cities/states are "sanctuary" cities/states? They're serving their corporate masters. At the expense of everyone else. Own it!
I'll ask you the same question... If e-verify has a 54% failure rate in identifying illegal alien workers, what means do employers have to improve on that?
Also, a suggestion... First step... Get the Dems to introduce a mandatory e-verify bill and let Congress vote. We'll see who wants what regarding illegal aliens.
Let's see the GOP bring it up. They are the ones whining about illegals. And if this 54% failure rate is true (no link provided), is that a reason to excuse whites from any responsibility?
Corporations are the masters of the left. Why do you think the Dems won't introduce a bill to mandate e-verify or support one that does so? Why do you think only Dem cities/states are "sanctuary" cities/states? They're serving their corporate masters. At the expense of everyone else. Own it!
Of course corporations are also the masters of the left. Right wing government ensures this.
They have. Several times. Always resisted by the Dems. Let the Dems introduce an e-verify mandate bill, for once.
Quote:
And if this 54% failure rate is true (no link provided), is that a reason to excuse whites from any responsibility?
Here's the info, and the link:
Quote:
"As seen in Exhibit 2, approximately 3.3 percent of all E-Verify findings are for unauthorized workers incorrectly found employment authorized and 2.9 percent of all findings are for unauthorized workers correctly not found employment authorized. Thus, almost half of all unauthorized workers are correctly not found to be employment authorized (2.9/6.2) and just over half are found to be employment authorized (3.3/6.2). Consequently, the inaccuracy rate for unauthorized workers is estimated to be approximately 54 percent with a plausible range of 37 percent to 64 percent. This finding is not surprising, given that since the inception of E-Verify it has been clear that many unauthorized workers obtain employment by committing identity fraud that cannot be detected by E-Verify"
As to the "whites" reference... How would an employer know an illegal alien is using a stolen identity if even e-verify can't accurately detect it, and admits so?
Can you imagine the gnashing of teeth and wailing that would ensue if employers started accusing prospective employees who spoke English with a heavy foreign accent, or didn't speak English at all, of using a stolen identity?
This is what you'd hear:
"Bigots!"
"Racists!"
"Xenophobes!"
"Nazis!"
"White Supremacists!"
"Haters!"
...Shortly followed by a plethora of discrimination lawsuits.
Of course, the alternative would be to just never hire anyone who speaks English with a heavy foreign accent, or doesn't speak English at all, just to be sure you don't hire any illegal aliens.
Either way... It would almost be funny to watch the hilarity ensue.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
