Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Nah...the information is too inside baseball to be made up. The WH obviously recognizes key details that could only be from an insider. That’s why Trump is on a rampage to find the leaker.
Yep. They know damn well that it’s legit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains
“Jeff should be investigating who the author of that piece was, because I really believe it’s national security,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One.
Looks like your Orange savior disagrees with you. Bit of a conundrum for Trump’s cult. No worries. You always have cognitive dissonance to fall back on.
That's so the DoJ can question the NYT to get the name of their so-called "source" and it will be revealed that they made it up.
would not be the first time the NYT did a op-ed and lied about the source
a few years ago an op-ed was supposedly written by a "senior whitehouse official, a senior energy analyst" and a federal analyst" , supposedly 3 people contributed to the op-ed.... turned out to be 1 intern......
You might want to check out post #19. Looks like your Orange buddy disagrees with your assertion.
So Trump hired “obozo” holdovers into his administration? Lol. Thanks for proving my point.
You have very little knowledge of how that works, they are government staffed, trump did not hire the person who wrote that letter (if anyone even actually wrote the letter). You're in a position no matter who is president...thanks for not knowing how things work and pushing your anti trump hate...even though it completely false....
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero
no, they are leftovers...NOT hired by trump, but still in the inner circle
thanks for proving that you have a reading comprehension disability
That's so the DoJ can question the NYT to get the name of their so-called "source" and it will be revealed that they made it up.
Speaking of reading comprehension...Referring to the author of the piece, Trump said he wanted the Justice Department to "take a look at what he had, what he gave, what he's talking about — also where he is right now."
"I don't want him in those meetings," Trump added, referring to "high level" meetings "concerning China or Russia or North Korea" that would have required a security clearance.
Looks like Trump agrees he has a rat problem in hos cabinet... although king rat would know vermin.
You might want to check out post #19. Looks like your Orange buddy disagrees with your assertion.
apparently you really do have a reading comprehension disability...
trump (who is an idiot new York liberal) said the justice dept should/could look into the alleged author of the op-ed that is most likely lies or from some inter, because this type of garbage is a threat to national security
Speaking of reading comprehension...Referring to the author of the piece, Trump said he wanted the Justice Department to "take a look at what he had, what he gave, what he's talking about — also where he is right now."
"I don't want him in those meetings," Trump added, referring to "high level" meetings "concerning China or Russia or North Korea" that would have required a security clearance.
Looks like Trump agrees he has a rat problem... although king rat would know his own.
yes there MAY be a rat...most likely an intern who KNOWS his tenure is running short
or it could be a "never trumper" turn-coat neo-con
yes there MAY be a rat...most likely an intern who KNOWS his tenure is running short
Lmfao. Well, well, well. Looks like your bubble is starting to burst.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
