Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yours is an argument that one can not win. Laws do not apply to those intent on breaking them. Your argument IMO only harms the bigger argument here. One does not have to be armed to come out on top.
I am pro 2nd Amendment (I support the entire Constitution) but I have zero desire to walk around armed. This guy did alright for himself.
Pro-gun people always think things would turn out better with more guns...
Here's a another failed topic that depends upon us accepting that the OP knows what 10s of millions of people might be thinking. It's nothing but an attempt to push narrative using a logical fallacy.
Show us one post on CD where any responsible gun owner has said that "things always turn out better with guns".
Pro-gun people always think things would turn out better with more guns...
Here's a another failed topic that depends upon us accepting that the OP knows what 10s of millions of people might be thinking. It's nothing but an attempt to push narrative using a logical fallacy.
/thread
I have been condemned more than once for being pro 2nd Amendment but having no desire to actually own or carry a gun myself.
{edit} you changed your reply so........you are also cherry picking by throwing in the word "responsible". It gives you an easy out.
Yes--only cops should have guns. Especially so they can break into your apartment and shoot you dead for no reason.
Does Donald Trump deserve armed security?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.