Chuck Schumer accused of raping teen (crime, biased, federal, status)

[earthlyfather]

Everyone can tell the truth. Just look at the way Chuck leers, over his spectacles, at women. Perp. No doubt. The U.N. should investigate. It's right there in NYC, where the dastardly deed occurred, of course.

[Spartacus713]

Originally Posted by Donna-501

It was made up!!!!

Yep. So is this smear campaign against Brett Kavanaugh.

[ClaraC]

Originally Posted by Spartacus713

Yep. So was this smear campaign against Brett Kavanaugh.

You don't know that.

You only are guessing that.

And that's different.

You're opining, with zero information, that Kavanaugh has been accused unjustly.

[Toyman at Jewel Lake]

Originally Posted by kdog

You should have quit after your first BS story. Now you're showing a pattern. False Claims About Kavanaugh’s Mom and Foreclosure | FactCheck.org

Dude-of course the first story I posted was BS-THAT WAS THE POINT. It's foolish to take an unverified story with an obviously political, opportunistic slant as the truth! No intelligent person would to so-I thought that was obvious. And yet-Democrats are willing to accept a 30 year old story, that was just related in the days after a man is nominated to the Supreme Court, as factual! In spite of the fact that this woman has a history of supporting liberal causes and attacking Republicans.

The story I quoted has not more (or less) credibility than does Chrissy Fords.

[Retroit]

Until Schumer denies it, I will assume it is true.

[ClaraC]

Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake

Dude-of course the first story I posted was BS-THAT WAS THE POINT. It's foolish to take an unverified story with an obviously political, opportunistic slant as the truth! No intelligent person would to so-I thought that was obvious. And yet-Democrats are willing to accept a 30 year old story, that was just related in the days after a man is nominated to the Supreme Court, as factual! In spite of the fact that this woman has a history of supporting liberal causes and attacking Republicans.

The story I quoted has not more (or less) credibility than does Chrissy Fords.

Wait, what? You PURPOSELY posted a story you knew was a lie?

[G1..]

Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake

Sense when do those on the left care about evidence? There is as much evidence about this as there is about Kavanaugh.

Sad the right is getting this desperate .

[G1..]

Originally Posted by Retroit

Until Schumer denies it, I will assume it is true.

Why deny something that is made up?

[biggunsmallbrains]

Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake

Sense when do those on the left care about evidence? There is as much evidence about this as there is about Kavanaugh.

I see. So this is your idea of teaching a lesson. The only lesson you’re proving is you’re partisanship. Like I said, enjoy the bubble.

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake

Dude-of course the first story I posted was BS-THAT WAS THE POINT. It's foolish to take an unverified story with an obviously political, opportunistic slant as the truth! No intelligent person would to so-I thought that was obvious. And yet-Democrats are willing to accept a 30 year old story, that was just related in the days after a man is nominated to the Supreme Court, as factual! In spite of the fact that this woman has a history of supporting liberal causes and attacking Republicans.

The story I quoted has not more (or less) credibility than does Chrissy Fords.

The woman willingly took a lie detector test which she passed and has the incident on record with a therapist as of six years ago when she was also urged to finally share the story with her husband. There is an eyewitness that she places in the room who is running away from testifying and there are others that are coming forward that recall hearing about the incident when it first occurred. So tell me...how is the bull-**** story you put out there even remotely the same, but above all why are you so afraid of a proper investigation while the alleged victim is not?