Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The report concludes that there would be insufficient evidence to prosecute Kav. That's irrelevant since he is not on trial and reasonable doubt is not the standard by which he is being evaluated for SCOTUS.
It was a fact-finding hearing with consequences. Feinstein will find out her consequence after lawyering up Ford, which is against Committee rules. The FBI will be looking into that. And also how her attorneys failed to mention that the Judiciary Committee was willing to meet with her in California.
Still, I believe Ford willingly played along with this charade. I believe she willingly wanted to work with the Democrats on this fiasco.
Trump and the GOP have ordered the FBI to stay away from the Swetnick accusations. That in itself tells you there is more than smoke there. Avenatti has been masterful in his takedown of Trump so far. It will all come out.
It's because she is not a credible witness and appears to be off her rocker.
Trump and the GOP have ordered the FBI to stay away from the Swetnick accusations. That in itself tells you there is more than smoke there. Avenatti has been masterful in his takedown of Trump so far. It will all come out.
Swetnick's allegations are absurd AND she is far from reliable looking at her past record. Even CNN, WAPO and NYT's stopped reporting on this fraud. If there was smoke there, trust me, the Dems would be pushing for her story to be heard. The silence should prove to you that nobody is taking her allegations seriously. Avenatti was basically torn apart in both CNN appearances I saw.
Trump and the GOP have ordered the FBI to stay away from the Swetnick accusations. That in itself tells you there is more than smoke there. Avenatti has been masterful in his takedown of Trump so far. It will all come out.
Why are people not posting links with their accusations?
Can someone explain to everyone, why we now have slander, libel & defamation laws and what happened prior to those laws being legislated.
Last time someone believed a woman without a doubt, no questions asked, Black men were swinging from trees.
Before that, women were burned and drown, no reasonable questions asked to defend themselves.
Neither of them armed.
15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
Can someone explain to everyone, why we now have slander, libel & defamation laws and what happened prior to those laws being legislated.
Let him bring those charges against her--in a real court room where witnesses on her side cannot be prevented from testifying. I'd love to watch the parade of Brett's old classmates get on the stand and tell all the stories they know about his drinking and bad behavior.
Which is exactly why Kavanaugh will never pursue such charges.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.