Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know what? Call me ignorant, call me anti-social, call me an incel, just keep calling me all whatever you want, those words empower me even more, just so you all know.
You know what is really empowering? Knowledge.
You could start with test tube babies and IVF. You do realize now that you were wrong?
You know what? Call me ignorant, call me anti-social, call me an incel, just keep calling me all whatever you want, those words empower me even more, just so you all know.
I haven't called you any of those things. I've simply asked you to explain your comments more fully.
I suggest you pay more attention to scientific research directions for the future. I'm sure folks from 1880 thought it was an "adorable" concept that humankind would one day walk on the moon. Hell, the way science is going these days, there may not be a need for humans, period--male or female--within just a few decades.
Hmm, more attention? I already have my graduate degree in biology (it goes so nicely with my undergrad in oceanography). I wonder what degree corresponds to "more attention"?
A man and his family have their lives ruined, and you have the audacity to make fun of him. You have no compassion and no shame.
You mean the president can make fun of an assault victim (with hundreds of fanboys and fangirls laughing their heads off) whose life was ruined, received death threats and had to move 3 times, but nobody else can?
Is this only a Trump presidential executive privilege thing?
Is he the only one who is allowed to have no shame and no compassion?
Why does this sound backwards? Isn't the POTUS supposed to set an example--not lead the meanies?
I suggest you pay more attention to scientific research directions for the future. I'm sure folks from 1880 thought it was an "adorable" concept that humankind would one day walk on the moon. Hell, the way science is going these days, there may not be a need for humans, period--male or female--within just a few decades.
So true I mean people are already hyping SDVs and trans humanism so...
Hmm, more attention? I already have my graduate degree in biology (it goes so nicely with my undergrad in oceanography). I wonder what degree corresponds to "more attention"?
You have an advanced degree in biology but you thought test tube babies were grown in test tubes? Was it an accredited school? If so, you should demand your money back.
You could start with test tube babies and IVF. You do realize now that you were wrong?
But Chrisc does have a point, we landed on the moon like only 6 decades into the 1900s.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
