Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have no problem with a black babysitter for white kids but I don't like the idea of a male babysitter.
The only males I allowed to watch my girls were my father, and my brother's who I completely trusted with them. A non related male is much more likely to molest that is a statistical fact.
He wasn't *attacked* and SHE did not *attack* anyone. Stop using words incorrectly!
The call was suspicious circumstances, as in, she was concerned that the circumstances could be an indicator of some kind of criminal activity or possible danger to the welfare of children.
Police encourage citizens to call if they find a situation suspicious. That's how they get most of their tips of crimes in progress.
That wasn't why the call was made. The call was made because the circumstances were suspicious, including the behavior of the group in the parking lot, a place known to be a hotbed of criminal activity.
The media has made the race of the people the primary focus of all their coverage. So that's the topic they have created and put forth for discussion. Primarily, the allegation is levied that the incident occurred only because the skin color of one of the participants was not white. Which has typically been false, and in fact the incident was driven by the BEHAVIOR of the "person of color".
This incident seems to be one of the rather rare exceptions to this general case. All the other many prominent stories turned into national/front page news by the race-baiting media have featured instances of "blacks being outraged the rules were applied to them".
This includes the street vending (and disturbing the peace), the napping, the inappropriate pool attire/lack of access card, the barbecuing incidents, the being disruptively loud on a private train,...and possibly others.
But all of these stories fall under the "blacks outraged the rules applied to them" category. Because in each one, it was their behavior (of not following the rules) that instigated the call to the police.
He wasn't *attacked* and SHE did not *attack* anyone. Stop using words incorrectly!
The call was suspicious circumstances, as in, she was concerned that the circumstances could be an indicator of some kind of criminal activity or possible danger to the welfare of children.
Police encourage citizens to call if they find a situation suspicious. That's how they get most of their tips of crimes in progress.
That wasn't why the call was made. The call was made because the circumstances were suspicious, including the behavior of the group in the parking lot, a place known to be a hotbed of criminal activity.
The media has made the race of the people the primary focus of all their coverage. So that's the topic they have created and put forth for discussion. Primarily, the allegation is levied that the incident occurred only because the skin color of one of the participants was not white. Which has typically been false, and in fact the incident was driven by the BEHAVIOR of the "person of color".
This incident seems to be one of the rather rare exceptions to this general case. All the other many prominent stories turned into national/front page news by the race-baiting media have featured instances of "blacks being outraged the rules were applied to them".
This includes the street vending (and disturbing the peace), the napping, the inappropriate pool attire/lack of access card, the barbecuing incidents, the being disruptively loud on a private train, the refusing to leave premises when requested incident,...and possibly others.
But all of these stories fall under the "blacks outraged the rules applied to them" category. Because in each one, it was their behavior (of not following the rules) that instigated the call to the police.
Oh come on. She called the police because she could not believe a black man should have white kids with him. Plain and simple;
Oh come on. She called the police because she could not believe a black man should have white kids with him. Plain and simple;
It was suspicious for a male to be with children that are obviously not biologically his own and who knows what else she noticed that was suspicious. There's a campaign to act suspicious and bait people so the media will run their agenda stories.
Oh come on. She called the police because she could not believe a black man should have white kids with him. Plain and simple;
Well let's go with your theory, sure. So if she had never seen that before, probably, then to her that was suspicious. Maybe she thought they were being trafficked or held against their will. How many black male childcare providers have YOU ever seen with white kids in a Walmart parking lot on the weekend?
Well let's go with your theory, sure. So if she had never seen that before, probably, then to her that was suspicious. Maybe she thought they were being trafficked or held against their will. How many black male childcare providers have YOU ever seen with white kids in a Walmart parking lot on the weekend?
I agree it's definitely something you don't see that often.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
