Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-12-2018, 08:54 PM
 
17,380 posts, read 9,207,763 times
Reputation: 11854

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
You’re barking logic at a rock pile.
Of course I know that ..... but I'm also aware that the "rock pile" is not the only reader here.
Normal People (and there are many) understand the "rock pile" that are seemly incapable of Logic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2018, 08:55 PM
 
2,068 posts, read 994,042 times
Reputation: 3641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
Interesting ......

Have you figured out yet how Dr Ford is getting all these "death threats" when her entire online presence and biography was COMPLETELY SCRUBBED from the internet before she even made her accusations???????

Even the Media could not find any information about her ... where she lived, her background.
They had to resort to attempting to find her at the University ....... because she was so well hidden.

And yet ....... all the "death threats" (as reported by ONLY her and HER Lawyers).
How do you suppose that happened?????????

It must have been that "vast right-wing conspiracy."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:03 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,399,570 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by neko_mimi View Post
That didn't answer the question. How are those threats actually reaching her?
Read.... If you don't want to know, don't read. You have access like everyone. Either receive it or don't. It doesn't change the facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:05 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,076,341 times
Reputation: 6842
Democrats STILL haven't explained why they believe Ford
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:15 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,866 posts, read 46,504,056 times
Reputation: 18520
Well the fake polls have Trump with close to 40% of the Black American vote.
Democrats are done!


I even bet a few races in California, that have never been close in the past, are really close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:19 PM
 
5,717 posts, read 3,136,217 times
Reputation: 7374
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Democrats STILL haven't explained why they believe Ford
That's a good point.

1. Dr. Ford alleges Kavanaugh assaulted her
2. Kavanaugh alleges that this accusation is false

Both made allegations. Why did democrats choose to side with Dr. Ford? But of course we all know why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:27 PM
 
25,803 posts, read 16,451,635 times
Reputation: 15993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
I was so furious and frustrated that she wasn't properly heeded, but at least she made a lasting impression that, like Anita Hill, helps us in the long run.

(By the way, I don't know what truly happened with the supposed offer to meet privately with the committee, even in California, but I've wondered if she was smart enough to know that her only safety lay in public hearings. If she'd met with them privately, they would have ensured that she was never widely heard.)


Kavanaugh the Most Unpopular Supreme Court Nominee Ever
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/09...inee-ever.html

Majority of Americans disapprove of Brett Kavanaugh, want further investigation
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...newstopstories
Only an absolute idiot would want someone to be “heeded” 36 years after a high school party. Pull yourself together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,591 posts, read 56,363,195 times
Reputation: 23297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
(By the way, I don't know what truly happened with the supposed offer to meet privately with the committee, even in California, but I've wondered if she was smart enough to know that her only safety lay in public hearings. If she'd met with them privately, they would have ensured that she was never widely heard.)
There never was an offer to meet privately with the committee.

What Grassley offered was to send staffers to California to meet with her.

Ford refused. She wanted to meet directly with the Senators, not their assistants.

Two of her attorneys were interviewed on by Dana Bash after the hearings. Both stated the Committee NEVER offered to meet privately with her.
Quote:
"We, as her counsel, informed her of all options made available to us by the committee. We showed her all of the correspondence," Bank said. "

"And what they were offering was sending staffers to speak to her. Dr. Ford wanted to speak to the committee members herself.

And I think what you saw in the hearing was that Dr. Ford got a little confused and thought Sen. Grassley was suggesting that he himself would have come to California, which is not what he offered at all."

https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/n...has-no-regrets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,170 posts, read 24,284,822 times
Reputation: 15285
With any luck, this whole debacle will be decided by the Supreme Court.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 09:42 PM
 
5,888 posts, read 3,211,871 times
Reputation: 5548
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
There never was an offer to meet privately with the committee.

What Grassley offered was to send staffers to California to meet with her.

Ford refused. She wanted to meet directly with the Senators, not their assistants.

Two of her attorneys were interviewed on by Dana Bash after the hearings. Both stated the Committee NEVER offered to meet privately with her.
Privately or not, who cares? They were willing to have her communicate directly to their office, which is the same thing every citizen that wants to communicate with their "representative" is offered. No Congress members respond directly to constituents. They will not talk to you on the phone, they will not respond to your email, and they will not be in if you ever attempt to visit them at their office. You cannot, will not see your congress member except at a public function, as a member of a crowd or audience at some event the member is attending.

This entitled woman demanded a personal audience with busy members of Congress, none of whom were even HER representative. Who the hell does she think she is?

Well, we know who she is. An entitled elite left coast Democrat agitator and donor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top