Fox News: We Condemn All Attempted Acts of Violence Against Media’ (Congress, enemy)

[EddieB.Good]

Except when a Republican tries to throw a reporter off a balcony...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ny-cong...er-after-sotu/

Or a Republican tackles and punches a reporter ...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-montana-video

Or a Republican calls reporters the "enemy of the people..."
https://www.ft.com/content/864244d8-...1-e5de165fa619

Other than that, Fox condemns acts of violence against the media...

[Mathguy]

Originally Posted by EddieB.Good

Except when a Republican tries to throw a reporter off a balcony...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ny-cong...er-after-sotu/

Or a Republican tackles and punches a reporter ...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-montana-video

Or a Republican calls reporters the "enemy of the people..."
https://www.ft.com/content/864244d8-...1-e5de165fa619

Other than that, Fox condemns acts of violence against the media...

Logically speaking you'd need to be linking to Fox news to show that they were saying it was ok....and not other news sources.

If you're going to try to craft an argument you should at least make it lucid.

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

Logically speaking you'd need to be linking to Fox news to show that they were saying it was ok....and not other news sources.

If you're going to try to craft an argument you should at least make it lucid.

yeah, eddie kinda crashed this one before it could even clear the gates.

FNDR has that effect on some folks.

[EddieB.Good]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

Logically speaking you'd need to be linking to Fox news to show that they were saying it was ok....and not other news sources.

If you're going to try to craft an argument you should at least make it lucid.

How exactly would I link to articles that don't exist? I'm pretty clearly stating that those condemnations are missing, so what evidence are you expecting me to provide about this absence? Logically speaking.

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by EddieB.Good

How exactly would I link to articles that don't exist? I'm pretty clearly stating that those condemnations are missing, so what evidence are you expecting me to provide about this absence? Logically speaking.

can you show us where your media outlet of choice condemns each of those incidents? so we have something to compare. right now you've comparing zero with zero, which is pretty boring.

[Phil75230]

You know what they say about horses and barn doors (thinking about the bombing attempts of CNN et al).

[Mathguy]

Originally Posted by EddieB.Good

How exactly would I link to articles that don't exist? I'm pretty clearly stating that those condemnations are missing, so what evidence are you expecting me to provide about this absence? Logically speaking.

You claim something but when asked to support your claim, you say that supporting your claim is impossible.

Say what?

[corpgypsy]

Originally Posted by EddieB.Good

Except when a Republican tries to throw a reporter off a balcony...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ny-cong...er-after-sotu/

Or a Republican tackles and punches a reporter ...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-montana-video

Or a Republican calls reporters the "enemy of the people..."
https://www.ft.com/content/864244d8-...1-e5de165fa619

Other than that, Fox condemns acts of violence against the media...

I agree with the above post. Too little, too late.

[EddieB.Good]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

You claim something but when asked to support your claim, you say that supporting your claim is impossible.

Say what?

I already gave you the proof. Maybe you should look at your screen closer?

[ambient]

Trump sure doesn't. He enjoys guys who can body-slam reporters. That plays really well with his deplorables.