Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:15 AM
 
5,888 posts, read 3,225,564 times
Reputation: 5548

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Where were the founders and immigrants from? Colonial America, US absolutely was founded by whites. Almost every nation was an "immigrant nation" at one time. Latin American nations are "immigrant nations". Israel, Japan etc were founded by immigrants.
Don't use their incorrect terminology dude. To be an "immigrant" there must first be a nation into which to immigrate. Immigration is a legal process that requires a geopolitical entity.

The correct word is colonials, or settlers. Or even, "migrant". But not immigrant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:16 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,560,145 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantompilot View Post
You are. Nobody else is, because there ARE no "white supremacists". The last person I know of who evinced the belief that whites are superior to all other races and therefore should rule over them all, is Abraham Lincoln.

But there aren't any people saying this today. Nobody evinces this belief today.
No?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:17 AM
 
9,897 posts, read 3,429,738 times
Reputation: 7737
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Because we are talking about white supremacist. Does that hurt your sensibilities?
Why would it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:18 AM
 
2,090 posts, read 3,575,984 times
Reputation: 2390
I’m still trying to figure out how one is going to peacefully create a white ethnostate out of a country with millions of nonwhite legal citizens. For example, blacks. If millions stayed in the South from the end of Civil War until the Civil Rights Act despite there being Jim Crow, the KKK, and no big welfare state for most of that time, what peaceful methods would get them to leave now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:20 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,833,471 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by stateofnature View Post
I’m still trying to figure out how one is going to peacefully create a white ethnostate out of a country with millions of nonwhite legal citizens. For example, blacks. If millions stayed in the South from the end of Civil War until the Civil Rights Act despite there being Jim Crow, the KKK, and no big welfare state for most of that time, what peaceful methods would get them to leave now?
It is just wishful thinking and blindly ignoring that the only way to ever achieve what they are advocating for would require widespread violence to do so. They of course want to gloss over that fact because it doesn't make them look "good" hence all the dancing around your question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:25 AM
 
5,888 posts, read 3,225,564 times
Reputation: 5548
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
It is just wishful thinking and blindly ignoring that the only way to ever achieve what they are advocating for would require widespread violence to do so. They of course want to gloss over that fact because it doesn't make them look "good" hence all the dancing around your question.
So your thesis is demographic change is a one-way operation. What has been changed, can never be changed again.

In other words, its a physically irreversible process, like a chemical reaction.

Is that kinda the gist of your theory?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:26 AM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,873,534 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantompilot View Post
Don't use their incorrect terminology dude. To be an "immigrant" there must first be a nation into which to immigrate. Immigration is a legal process that requires a geopolitical entity.

The correct word is colonials, or settlers. Or even, "migrant". But not immigrant.
Yeah I put "immigrant" in quotations. My point was that by the left's definition just about every nation qualifies as an "immigrant nation".

Even after the US 1780s onward was established and had bonafide immigrants they still were overwhelmingly NW Europeans and naturalization was restricted to whites. American was never a nation of mass globalized immigration until leftists made it so in the 1960s.

And what if America had basically open borders (to Europe mostly) pre 1880s? America had slavery and indentured servitude too. Should it never been ended either because America as founded was a "nation of slavery"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:29 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,833,471 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantompilot View Post
So your thesis is demographic change is a one-way operation. What has been changed, can never be changed again.

In other words, its a physically irreversible process, like a chemical reaction.

Is that kinda the gist of your theory?
My thesis is that you nor anyone else in this thread has proposed a workable non violent way to accomplish what you are talking about and you will continue to be unable to for whatever duration you decide to participate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:30 AM
 
5,888 posts, read 3,225,564 times
Reputation: 5548
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
My thesis is that you nor anyone else in this thread has proposed a workable non violent way to accomplish what you are talking about and you will continue to be unable to for whatever duration you decide to participate.
Well then you didn't read the thread very carefully.

It has been explained repeatedly; any demographic change accomplished by a policy can be reversed by a policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2018, 11:31 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,833,471 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantompilot View Post
Well then you didn't read the thread very carefully.

It has been explained repeatedly.
Refresh my memory, lay it out step by step for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top