Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interview starts at 10 min in. UK news (typical BBC choice of items) before that, then some US comments. They started anti-Trump, but I skipped on to the interview. Frank Gaffney, close friend of Pres T’s National Security Advisor
Listening now, includes “police say these were live devices”. But live does not mean “armed, with an operational trigger”. If even one had operated that would indeed change the balance of possibilities.
Interview starts at 10 min in. UK news (typical BBC choice of items) before that, then some US comments. They started anti-Trump, but I skipped on to the interview. Frank Gaffney, close friend of Pres T’s National Security Advisor
Listening now, includes “police say these were live devices”. But live does not mean “armed, with an operational trigger”. If even one had operated that would indeed change the balance of possibilities.
Those "bombs" were live devices and could explode in the same way matches are live devices and could start a fire.
Interview starts at 10 min in. UK news (typical BBC choice of items) before that, then some US comments. They started anti-Trump, but I skipped on to the interview. Frank Gaffney, close friend of Pres T’s National Security Advisor
Listening now, includes “police say these were live devices”. But live does not mean “armed, with an operational trigger”. If even one had operated that would indeed change the balance of possibilities.
Oh I see, so UK news didn't say anything about Democrats being implicated in these bombings, It was Frank Gaffney who said it. I just spit my coffee, Frank Gaffney is a goofball he sees conspiracies in the swirls in his cappuccino
Some Suspected Mail Bombs Were Not Capable of Exploding, Others Yet to Be Analyzed, Officials Say
Some of the 10 suspected mail bombs addressed to high-profile Democrats and others over the last few days were flawed and not capable of exploding, while others have yet to be fully analyzed, several investigators said Thursday.
In some cases, the flaws were substantial. In others, more subtle, they said.
The news comes after investigators said the devices appeared poorly made and that it was unclear if they were hoaxes or simply cases of bad construction. Earlier in the investigation, officials in multiple states had described the items as live explosives and a number of senior bomb techs briefed on the probe said they had all the components necessary for successful explosions...
...None of the 10 seized devices detonated, and no one has been hurt.
I'm fearful that other crazy people will be encouraged by this terrorist behavior.
A black man at a Charlotte polling site yesterday was called the n-word told he was "a black piece of ****" by an angry white man, and then the guy lifted his shirt to show the black man he had a gun. The thug was arrested and local authorities said he will be charged with multiple crimes.
No, not yet. These are all fake prop bombs. That's why NONE of them have detonated.
You know, I won't be surprised the democrats just hired some explosives expert that Hollywood uses for their movies, and these fake bombs are probably old props from past movies.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That was easy....
