Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:41 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,444,381 times
Reputation: 14266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
1. liberals have always been violent
Clearly, some conservatives are violent as well. like the one who ran over that woman at Charlottesville. Or the ones who lynched all the blacks in the South.

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
2. liberals have a history of false flag attacks...ie burning the Reichstag
Yes, the Reichstag really supports your argument as to what is happening with these bombs here in America in 2018. Jesus Christ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
3. right wingers would not be stupid enough to send bombs (that dont blow up) 2 weeks before an election, that has a lot hanging on 50/50 campaigns


4. right wingers , if they sent bombs...would actually explode
Oh really? You personally know and vouch for every single right winger in the United States? You're positive that none of them could perhaps be...irrational? Or maybe not an expert bomb maker?

What you think all conservatives know how to optimize mailable explosives? Is this something you learned at Trump University?


Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
5. the fact that the bombs (now a half dozen) and NONE of them exploded, even though they were opened (at least the one to Soros and to Brennen ) ...and taking photos of a supposed "live bomb" that could have detonated (especially with cell/radio waves)… point to the fact they were never designed to blow up, just be a distraction to make 'the righties" look bad..... probable the most important point showing its a lefty false flag
Or it could be a sign that the bomber is not very good at what he or she is doing, which is totally plausible since you don't know who it is and what their background is. Also possible that they weren't intended to blow up, but that's no proof that it was a liberal plant.

You're a good example of what happens when you reach a conclusion well before the event and then fit everything in your mind to reinforce your belief.

 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:41 PM
 
24,392 posts, read 23,044,056 times
Reputation: 14982
There's probably an 80% chance this whole thing is fake and done as a political stunt to drum up support for voters to get out and be anti Trump. It could be some crazy but anyone going to all that trouble would almost certainly know that the packages would never get to their targets and would work against whatever political statement they were trying to make.
So call it a conspiracy theory but politicos and the feds live on this stuff and do nothing but plot and plan and work out scenarios and look under beds far more then even the most dedicated internet conspiracy theorist.
Did I say 80%? Make that 90%.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:43 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,251 posts, read 23,719,256 times
Reputation: 38626
Quote:
Originally Posted by staywarm2 View Post
“Lock her up” is said with such hate at those rallies that it could easily be turned into a bombing.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:45 PM
 
12,003 posts, read 11,888,749 times
Reputation: 22689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
I said more likely to be a left wing nut but the Democrats advocating violence could also have motivated a right wing nut...just like the brown shirt leftist nazis in Charlottesville,Va prevented a lawful march of the Nazi White nuts which motivated one of their crazies to run over a leftist brown shirt nazi killing her.
The young lady who was murdered in Charlottesville was not what you just called her. This is slanderous. She was an innocent who was peacefully protesting the presence of out of state right wing extremists in her city, as she had every right to do when she was deliberately targeted and hit by a car driven by one of these neo-Nazis, killing her as a result. The tragedy is extremely well-documented, and you have just spoken cruel and false words about someone who lost her young life because of hatred.

Isn't the truth enough for you? Why the lies and insinuations and fakery?

Shameful.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,356 posts, read 19,128,594 times
Reputation: 26229
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
It's funny how you pin the "brown shirt nazi" label on the dead victim, not the violent white supremacist who killed her. I guess you never heard of how linked the philosophies of white supremacist groups, i.e. skinheads, are with Nazism? You clearly have no idea what that word even entails.
They were both brown shirt Nazi thugs. She was part of a group that used violence to stop a lawful demonstration which motivated him to employ increased violence.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:46 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,356 posts, read 19,128,594 times
Reputation: 26229
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigCreek View Post
The young lady who was murdered in Charlottesville was not what you just called her. This is slanderous. She was an innocent who was peacefully protesting the presence of out of state right wing extremists in her city, as she had every right to do when she was deliberately targeted and hit by a car driven by one of these neo-Nazis, killing her as a result. The tragedy is extremely well-documented, and you have just spoken cruel and false words about someone who lost her young life because of hatred.

Isn't the truth enough for you? Why the lies and insinuations and fakery?

Shameful.
She was part of a Leftist brown shirt mob that used violence to stop a lawful protest.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:46 PM
 
3,368 posts, read 1,604,433 times
Reputation: 1652
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post

5. the fact that the bombs (now a half dozen) and NONE of them exploded, even though they were opened (at least the one to Soros and to Brennen ) ...and taking photos of a supposed "live bomb" that could have detonated (especially with cell/radio waves)… point to the fact they were never designed to blow up, just be a distraction to make 'the righties" look bad..... probable the most important point showing its a lefty false flag
Agreed.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:48 PM
 
12,003 posts, read 11,888,749 times
Reputation: 22689
What's the point of your choice of picture here? Are you trying to deflect or minimize the extreme seriousness of what occurred in our country on October 24? Attempted assassinations of two former Presidents and a former Vice President, their families, including a minor child, an attack on the free press, senators, and other government officials is not something to take lightly or mock with a silly photo.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:48 PM
 
3,368 posts, read 1,604,433 times
Reputation: 1652
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigCreek View Post

The package was not fake. Like the others that have been intercepted, it contained explosives that were potentially lethal and could have killed or maimed anyone nearby.

.
Which report has stated this? Every interview I have seen has avoided saying this.
 
Old 10-24-2018, 10:50 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,444,381 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
umm..there was no "jumping to conclusions".

My conclusion was well thought out and based on probability study on multiple angles. All the people involved were NEVER IN DANGER FROM THESE SO CALLED UNARMED "BOMBS".

why no bombs sent to Kamala, Booker, McCaskill, Sinema?

tell me
LOL... your conclusion was "well thought out and based on probability study?" Probability study of what - the voices of delusion in right wing skulls? You're really funny! I'm sure you crunched the numbers and made sure to carry over the ones..

To give you the obvious, common sense answers to your two points (which again, you should have already known):

1. Just because they didn't blow up doesn't "prove" anything about who did it, much less the elaborate left-wing conspiracy you cooked up. It suggests either that [a] the bomber is a ****ty amateur, or [b] the bomber was more interested in sending a threatening message than killing.

2. The bomber probably has some capacity constraints and wasn't able to send a bomb to every single Democrat on the planet. Also, the person just may not be so rational and operate according to the list of liberals you would bomb.

LOL...all you cons looking at how the bombs didn't explode. Did it occur to you that one person behind this might not be a master bomb-maker? It's like conservatives all took mailable bomb-making shop in their rural villages and are surprised that someone wouldn't have a high degree of expertise with it. :-)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top