How is diversity good if it leads to political parties fragmenting the vote into factions? (borders, state)

[Eumaois]

When you are so into diversity that you change the race, sexual orientation, and gender of an established fictional character (for example, a White straight guy named "Terry" is now a Black lesbian), you are not doing very well beyond appeasing the SJW liberal crowd.

[Oldglory]

Originally Posted by subaru5555

Diversity is strength.


It’s a common ploy of white supremacists to push the narrative that “diversity is bad”; they’re attempting to make the concept of a “white ethnostate” more palatable to “normies”.

Diversity of race can be strength if you're speaking of genetics. Diversity of culture not so much. It just creates clash.

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by mtl1

But I can't see any scenario under your proposal there wouldn't be a much larger deluge of migration into America and no removals.

There would be no America as in the State known as the U.S.

If you don't want to associate with someone you don't have to under anarchy.

The State forces diversity and does so to divide the populace as it rapes, pillages, and plunders us peasants.

Divide and conquer.

[Oldglory]

Originally Posted by Eumaois

When you are so into diversity that you change the race, sexual orientation, and gender of an established fictional character (for example, a White straight guy named "Terry" is now a Black lesbian), you are not doing very well beyond appeasing the SJW liberal crowd.

The movie re-make of "Annie" that came out awhile back was played by a black girl. WTH?

[subaru5555]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

Diversity of race can be strength if you're speaking of genetics. Diversity of culture not so much. It just creates clash.

Diversity of culture is also strength; one would have to be brainwashed to believe otherwise.

[Sharks With Lasers]

I don't understand why this thread even exists.

Diversity of perspectives generally means more creativity and innovation. And I have no clue why allowing people of color to sit at the same table as white people is a bad thing.

[redwood66]

People will always resent being forced to do anything.

[VA Yankee]

Originally Posted by mightleavenyc

Explain libs. Diversity weakens a country's unity in all ways.

No, extremists at both end of the spectrum are what weaken the county, individuality has been one of our strengths.

[mtl1]

Originally Posted by Sharks With Lasers

I don't understand why this thread even exists.

Diversity of perspectives generally means more creativity and innovation. And I have no clue why allowing people of color to sit at the same table as white people is a bad thing.

Have you ever talked to most "people of color"? It's always about socialism and imposition, make everything less white represented, and what they feel is right and beneficial for them, and how horrible white people all are.

[montydean]

Originally Posted by PullMyFinger

Natural diversity is good. Forced diversity sucks.

Any proof to “natural” diversity being good? Brazil is very naturally diverse and it is a dumpster fire.