Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
you know, when everyone else disagrees with you, it might just be you that's wrong. you should use this logic in your real life. it's like meeting someone, and they think everyone is an idiot. after a while, you realize that they're the one with the problem. you're the only one who agrees with you. I guess ebony magazine is not the only one that is bad at math, eh bro?
Ok. And?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1
No matter how much you want to try to pretend the title was ”The U.S. House of Representatives has 18 Black women on the ballot who seek to push America forward,” that wasn’t the title. The actual title was “Meet the 18 Black Women Running for a Seat in Congress.” That title is factually incorrect as there are 24 black women running for a seat in Congress, including one running for re-election. This is not complicated.
Reading the first paragraph does not change the reality that the title was factually incorrect.
Creating imaginary titles isn’t proof that the real title is factually correct either.
Totally depends on the person's definition of forward. I imagine most conservatives have a different definition of that than you.
Dude.... you have to actually introduce facts, not wishful thinking, to make that claim.
I don't have to introduce facts. The facts are in the article. Suddenly requiring article titles to spell out the details discussed in the body is definitely new to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1
I made my point and I'm not a Conservative. I'm not even Republican. I'm just a Democrat who knows how to read.
I don't have to introduce facts. The facts are in the article. Suddenly requiring article titles to spell out the details discussed in the body is definitely new to me.
No matter how much you want to try to pretend the title was ”The U.S. House of Representatives has 18 Black women on the ballot who seek to push America forward,” that wasn’t the title. The actual title was “Meet the 18 Black Women Running for a Seat in Congress.” That title is factually incorrect as there are 24 black women running for a seat in Congress, including one running for re-election. This is not complicated.
Reading the first paragraph does not change the reality that the title was factually incorrect.
Creating imaginary titles isn’t proof that the real title is factually correct either.
Totally depends on the perspn’s definition of forward. I imagine most conservatives have a different definition of that than you.
If I've been proven wrong, it definitely wasn't by someone that can't string two sentences together to make a point...
you've been proven wrong by everyone on this thread. as I said before, you're the only one that is on your side. you're at a point now where you're trying to get the thread closed so people will stop being mean to you.
Don't be silly. Black Republicans are not real blacks, according to Democrats. You do not leave the Democrat plantation without consequences - it's always been that way and don't you dare try to tell Democrats what to do with their blacks.
The push back from your post says it all.
I believe someone once said that "people would rather be lied to, than told they are being lied to".
All you did was state the obvious and it outraged the tribe. The Dems require all minorities, women, LGBTQ to be in lock step - even though their history of actually helping these classes is nil. It's mind-boggling.
I'll probably get hammered for simply pointing it out.
I've come to expect that any sort of facts require the ire of the herd. It was in the memo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1
That would be okay had the title not been: “Meet the 18 Black Women Running for a Seat in Congress”
The word “the” implies the other six don’t exist. Always nice to know if you don’t fall into the proper group think there are people who think you can no longer claim your race.
YOU are exactly correct! As if anyone should be put into a box, or a basket.
Don’t know, don’t care. They have nothing to do with the article being discussed. If they are factually incorrect that doesn’t excuse Ebony for being factually incorrect. Surely your mama told you two wrongs don’t make a right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good
I don't have to introduce facts. The facts are in the article. Suddenly requiring article titles to spell out the details discussed in the body is definitely new to me.
They aren’t required to spell out the details but they should at least be factually correct.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
I don't have to introduce facts. The facts are in the article. Suddenly requiring article titles to spell out the details discussed in the body is definitely new to me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
