Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The one does not invalidate the others. Has nothing to do with them.
No, at least two have admitted flat-out, full-on lying about Kavanaugh abusing them.
Of course, it took the FBI knocking on their door to find their truth bone..........
And so we should just ignore the liars..........things DO happen in a vacuum, I guess! It doesn't cast the slightest bit of doubt on the OTHER accusations, I guess..............
HUH!
As it does to the right, such as refusing to investigate the credible claim of Kavanaugh's college roommate that Kavanaugh lied under oath to Congress.
When Clinton lied under oath to Congress they impeached him.
When Kavanugh was accused of lying under oath to Congress, instead of investigating, they gave him a lifetime job.
Bunch of dam hypocrites.
Clinton DID lie under oath to Congress (he wasn't "ACCUSED" of it). In fact, he was disbarred for it.
And other than that, he suffered NO consequences, none, zip, zilch, nada.
"Impeached" means nothing............was he, or was he not, CONVICTED and removed??
Not one Democrat who was voting against Kavanaugh seems to be going forward at this time to seek so called justice for the women who falsely accused Kavanaugh!
None of the democrats, have apologized for the wrong doing to the Kavanaugh family and stress, injustice, slender, etc. that is done to this very good person and his family.
That is something that is very difficult to forgive. Anyway, voting these democrats out is what needs to be done.
As it does to the right, such as refusing to investigate the credible claim of Kavanaugh's college roommate that Kavanaugh lied under oath to Congress.
When Clinton lied under oath to Congress they impeached him.
When Kavanugh was accused of lying under oath to Congress, instead of investigating, they gave him a lifetime job.
Bunch of dam hypocrites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by maineguy8888
Clinton DID lie under oath to Congress (he wasn't "ACCUSED" of it). In fact, he was disbarred for it.
And other than that, he suffered NO consequences, none, zip, zilch, nada.
"Impeached" means nothing............was he, or was he not, CONVICTED and removed??
I guess im being a stickler here.
Clinton did not lie under oath to congress. He was not impeached for lying under oath to congress.
Clinton lied during a sworn deposition during a legal proceeding. He committed perjury which is a felony.
This is what he was impeached for. and what he should have been removed for. whats funny is, had he been removed from office, it is highly likely that Gore would have won the 2000 election.
The one does not invalidate the others. Has nothing to do with them.
well... 3 women made claims.
1 said she made it up. another has been referred for criminal investigation.
Only 1 made a claim that was enough to bring her before the committee , but vague enough to insure she cannot be called a liar.
so how many other real victims?
1 vague claim that cannot be substantiated or affirmatively disproven.
and 1 real victim.... you know... the guy BK threw ice at during his college years one time.
Not sure why the LWLTs on here keep wanting to post the same tired old, disproven canards about Justice Kavanaugh. Just face, you were totally wrong, and go on with your life.
If she's lying she should be prosecuted. And no, he should not have been confirmed. Had nothing to do with this woman telling the truth or not. He just doesn't have the temperament.
He's an excellent jurist.
Less than 3 of his decisions were ever over-turned by an higher court.
He follows precedent rather than legislating from the bench, which is why his decisions were rarely over-turned.
If anything, Kavanaugh is pro-Defense and anti-Prosecutor in criminal cases and pro-Defense anti-Plaintiff in civil cases.
He's a big believer in the "reasonable person" standard rather than assuming people are super-humans or adopting the lesser "least sophisticated person" standard.
He often joined his Liberal colleagues in dissenting on opinions, when he was an appellate judge.
It is incorrect to suggest Kavanuagh is some ultra-right winger.
If anything, Kavanaugh is a right-leaning Moderate, and he's only "right-leaning" because he follows tradition and historical precedent.
You're not very informed on the matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
As it does to the right, such as refusing to investigate the credible claim of Kavanaugh's college roommate that Kavanaugh lied under oath to Congress.
The claims were investigated.
The FBI interviewed witness after witness after witness and was unable to obtain any evidence corroborating her claims.
Not only could the FBI not corroborate her claims, but no witness could put her and Kavanaugh together at any point in time.
There was simply no evidence to lay any foundation for any crime of any kind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
When Clinton lied under oath to Congress they impeached him.
When Kavanugh was accused of lying under oath to Congress, instead of investigating, they gave him a lifetime job.
Bunch of dam hypocrites.
Clinton did lie. It wasn't an accusation, it was a fact as a matter of record, in contrast to a mere accusation against Kavanaugh that the FBI could not coorborate when the FBI did their investigation.
Not one Democrat who was voting against Kavanaugh seems to be going forward at this time to seek so called justice for the women who falsely accused Kavanaugh!
None of the democrats, have apologized for the wrong doing to the Kavanaugh family and stress, injustice, slender, etc. that is done to this very good person and his family.
That is something that is very difficult to forgive. Anyway, voting these democrats out is what needs to be done.
DIMs never apologize for any their vile, hate-filled acts.
As it does to the right, such as refusing to investigate the credible claim of Kavanaugh's college roommate that Kavanaugh lied under oath to Congress.
When Clinton lied under oath to Congress they impeached him.
When Kavanugh was accused of lying under oath to Congress, instead of investigating, they gave him a lifetime job.
Bunch of dam hypocrites.
Personally, I think the Republicans went too far back then. But Clinton did lie. Granted, the caught him in a perjury trap -- the very thing that Trump is being very strongly cautioned to avoid right now. But he did lie under oath. We know this 100% for a fact. He did indeed "have sexual relations with that woman." He should have never allowed himself to be perjury trapped, but he did and the rest is history.
Now please prove that Kavanaugh lied under oath. This means there can be no room left for any reasonable human being to doubt. Can you do it? And I don't think misremembering how many beers you had on April 5th, 1983 counts. I mean actually lying.
Clinton did not lie under oath to congress. He was not impeached for lying under oath to congress.
Clinton lied during a sworn deposition during a legal proceeding. He committed perjury which is a felony.
This is what he was impeached for. and what he should have been removed for. whats funny is, had he been removed from office, it is highly likely that Gore would have won the 2000 election.
we would have never had GWB.
how crazy is that?
TY for the correction, I was copying what the previous poster wrote without thinking about it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
