Jim Acosta's WH pass suspended (interview, illegal, lawyer, Sanders)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know. But I do know this: SHS very specifically said Acosta's WH credentials were yanked for his physical treatment of the female intern.
Think carefully about that. The WH really has no choice but to do so. Acosta violated Labor Law. He created a Hostile Work Environment by making it impossible for the intern to do her job by using physical force/intimidation against her. According to Labor Law, the WH, as the intern's employer, could be held liable for allowing Acosta to do so. So they have no choice but to yank his credentials. It was the legally appropriate course of action.
Again... SHS very specifically said Acosta's WH credentials were yanked for his physical treatment of the female intern.
Think carefully about that. The WH really has no choice but to do so. Acosta violated Labor Law. He created a Hostile Work Environment by making it impossible for the intern to do her job by using physical force/intimidation against her. According to Labor Law, the WH, as the intern's employer, could be held liable for allowing Acosta to do so. So they have no choice but to yank his credentials. It was the legally appropriate course of action.
Originally Posted by Pilot1 I saw it LIVE. The female WH aid went to take the mike, and Acosta shoved her hand out of the way. His actions were overly aggressive, inappropriate, and possibly illegal. Why do so many think Acosta's actions were OK? They weren't!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones
Leftists will defend a bully to the very end. That's who they are.
Inappropriate of him not to relinquish the microphone ? Absolutely.
Overly aggressive? Nah.
Possibly illegal? That's laughable - contact a lawyer.
He didn't bully her either.
You folks must be so hypersensitive that you feel intimidated and bullied by people who don't slowly and gently do what you want them to do. Which is fine - we all have our issues - but don't pretend this is normal thinking or that anyone else needs to buy into it
And if the raw footage shows beyond a shadow of a doubt all those things some claim here -- why would The White House feel the need to use doctored video?
That makes no sense at all.
The only reason The White House would choose to present a fake video is because they feel that the original is not conclusive.
That's the only reason I'm sure Sarah Sanders would lie right - -her being such a decent human being and all.
Jim Acosta had a spirit brother from Fox News (I think it was Fox News). Constantly interrupting and disrupting. Obama simply tossed the guy out of the room and he did it to the cheers and applause of the news corps. I agree with him. That was Obama's house at the time and the President can kick anyone out of his house that he wants.
Dude we were watching the news conference live. It was very clear that Accosta pushers her away. Plain as day. He should never be allowed back into the White House.
Actually, it does. Making it impossible for someone to do their job is a violation of Labor Law.
Actually it doesn’t.
Labor law has nothing to do with this; you’re literally grasping at straws out of desperation to push an incredibly weak narrative.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.