Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-12-2018, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Because that's the law. You are getting far afield and into the anarchy stuff from the topic of non-citizens not having the right to intrude on another's territory.
Well, that's why I'm an anarchist. I believe in natural law. You believe in man-made law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2018, 09:31 PM
 
4,668 posts, read 3,899,635 times
Reputation: 3437
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
But unfortunately it is and has been happening to the US and much of the West at an somewhat controlled and limited rate. It's not even really debate of should it be happening or not but of rate. Let's face facts. Our current immigration policies for a while now is mass, global movement plus illegal movement into the US.
Thats how a free country should work. If a country doesn't allow immigration, then emigration will eventually stop, that doesn't sound like a free society to me and not one I would want to be a part of.

Everything is good in moderation, no immigration is just a bad as open borders, both would end a society. Communists like to close off borders to migration, looks at how that turns out. Ending migration in a free capitalist society can't happen, it would destroy the whole system. Free migration goes hand in hand with freedom and capitalism, but that does not mean it should not be regulated. Everything in moderation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2018, 09:34 PM
 
4,668 posts, read 3,899,635 times
Reputation: 3437
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Well, that's why I'm an anarchist. I believe in natural law. You believe in man-made law.
What, no... an anarchist who is against state control of borders, so confusing.

Not saying I agree with you, since I am stubborn statist, but I agree with you to an extent. Freedom of movement is important for capitalism and a free society, but I also believe the state can use force to restrict things, like borders and how fast we want to burn down a forest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2018, 10:37 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,873,534 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Well, that's why I'm an anarchist. I believe in natural law. You believe in man-made law.
No anarchist believe in making up their own law not based on natural history or any culture I'm aware of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2018, 10:40 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,873,534 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattks View Post
Thats how a free country should work. If a country doesn't allow immigration, then emigration will eventually stop, that doesn't sound like a free society to me and not one I would want to be a part of.

Everything is good in moderation, no immigration is just a bad as open borders, both would end a society. Communists like to close off borders to migration, looks at how that turns out. Ending migration in a free capitalist society can't happen, it would destroy the whole system. Free migration goes hand in hand with freedom and capitalism, but that does not mean it should not be regulated. Everything in moderation.
I don't agree with anything you're saying. Japan doesn't have much immigration but does well. Many countries don't allow much immigration and do very well.

Continuous population growth isn't sustainable anyway. But if a country wanted to grow it's population it should do it with native births.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2018, 02:02 AM
 
11,337 posts, read 11,041,348 times
Reputation: 14993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
So self defense isn't a natural right? -interesting.
Correct. There is no right to self-defense. Unless we create it as men and agree to it. A right is not determined by anything other than men. Nature does not confer rights, and no rights exist without men to invent them, implement them, respect them, observe them, etc. You don’t get rights by being alive. There are no natural rights at all. There are no God given rights. Rights are an agreement by men to curtail behaviors in an effort to engage in social cooperation. We are rational and social animals, and rights are a tool that we invent to make society work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2018, 02:05 AM
 
11,337 posts, read 11,041,348 times
Reputation: 14993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
There are plenty of natural rights, but they pretty all much centre around a person being an individual foremost, and not being beholden to some communistic cave ape group mentality
Incorrect. Rights are social agreements. They don’t exist in nature or outside of Man as a rational and social animal. And that is pretty obvious really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2018, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
Individual countries are increasingly just ignoring the UN and making their own rules.

The UN needs to respect individual democracies and not just impose it's will on democratically elected countries.

Furthermore the UN can't force countries to sign legislation or even enforce legislation.
We should have withdrawn from the UN years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2018, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,676,363 times
Reputation: 7608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
Correct. There is no right to self-defense. Unless we create it as men and agree to it. A right is not determined by anything other than men. Nature does not confer rights, and no rights exist without men to invent them, implement them, respect them, observe them, etc. You don’t get rights by being alive. There are no natural rights at all. There are no God given rights. Rights are an agreement by men to curtail behaviors in an effort to engage in social cooperation. We are rational and social animals, and rights are a tool that we invent to make society work.
Sounds like commie BS -someone comes at you you with an axe in a foreign country, I doubt you'll be spending time inquiring as to the social cooperation status of trying to defend yourself.

You'll be implementing probably the oldest right there is - the right to survive. Although after reading this nonsense you just posted, you'll probably try and respond with hugs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
Incorrect. Rights are social agreements. They don’t exist in nature or outside of Man as a rational and social animal. And that is pretty obvious really.
Natural rights are different -the right to life, self defense,food, shelter, liberty etc are yours for the taking -the slave is always justified in killing the slaveowner, regardless of what your little cooperative agreements say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2018, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
Correct. There is no right to self-defense. Unless we create it as men and agree to it. A right is not determined by anything other than men. Nature does not confer rights, and no rights exist without men to invent them, implement them, respect them, observe them, etc. You don’t get rights by being alive. There are no natural rights at all. There are no God given rights. Rights are an agreement by men to curtail behaviors in an effort to engage in social cooperation. We are rational and social animals, and rights are a tool that we invent to make society work.
Wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top