Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let this be heard in court if it even goes so far. I bet she probably did hit him first and he hit her back.This is will be dismissed in court but police always err on arresting the man. We should give Avenatti the benefit of the doubt regardless whether you agree with him and his stunts. Treat people based on your principle's not petty vengence.
Why? because one hit cancels out another hit? Its not football where offset penalties occur, Lmao.
You certainty dont know how domestic violence works.
Doesn't mean that Avenatti can't say he is innocent.
Doesn't mean that some can't think that the charges are bogus.
Nobody is asking for it to be both ways.
Sure he can claim innocence but will the liberal media claim he said it with too much or too little zeal so therefor he must be guilty because of how he claimed his innocence?
Geez, Democrats keep getting caught up and bit in the arse for their own BS lol
lmao.. I'm enjoying watching all the Leftist smear merchants getting smacked about and forced to swallow their own putrid medicine as they gag on it.
I gota admit, this actually made my week. I love it when the left is a victim of its own BS. I still get good chuckle out of Al Franken having to grit his teeth and be forced to step down by his own party. The left's kangaroo court turned on the judge himself on that one.
Avenatti was being tossed around as being the Dem nominee--well that's dead now.... and now the Dems should all be for holding a long drawn out investigation to get to the bottom of it.
I'd also like to see them stampede out a long line of women claiming that they were victims too with no evidence.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,555 posts, read 12,525,568 times
Reputation: 10473
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey
There is a difference between being accused and denying it but refusing to call for an investigation and denying it and welcoming an investigation due to the belief that it will result in vindication. I have no idea what Kavanaugh and Avenatti did and did not do. Given the perfunctory investigation performed on the claims against Kavanaugh,I will never know whether Kavanaugh is guilty or innocent of trying to molest someone, which is a shame given that he is a public figure with immense power to shape the future of the country. I hope that there will be an investigation by law enforcement and I will ultimately know whether Avenatti is guilty or innocent.
There is another person who had claimed it was him who was with Ford and not BK. At the time he gave his statement to the SJC only a very small group knew Ford's story - Ford, her lawyers, maybe feinstein and the other Senator, I can't remember her name offhand. His statement mirrored Ford's story several different times. There is no way a person could be so exact if they weren't there. Which means BK is likely completely innocent of the matter.
As for creepy porn lawyer..even though there is far more evidence against him than there ever was with BK, there still isn't enough to point a finger at him and say without a doubt that he's guilty.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
